Job Dekker PhD
Title Professor
Institution University of Massachusetts Medical School
Department Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology
Address University of Massachusetts Medical School
364 Plantation Street, Room 509
Worcester MA 01605
Telephone 508/856-4371
Email
Other Positions
Institution UMMS - School of Medicine
Department Program in Gene Function & Expression

Institution UMMS - School of Medicine
Department Program in Molecular Medicine

Institution UMMS - Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
Department Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology

Institution UMMS - Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
Department Bioinformatics & Computational Biology

Institution UMMS - Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
Department Interdisciplinary Graduate Program

Institution UMMS - Programs, Centers & Institutes
Department Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology
Narrative


Academic Background

Job Dekker received his B.S. (1993) and his Ph.D. (1997) from the University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. From 1998 to 2003, he was a post-doctoral fellow at Harvard University during which time he was awarded an NWO-TALENT stipendium, an EMBO long-term fellowship and a fellowship from The Medical Foundation / Charles A. King Trust. Dr. Dekker joined the University of Massachusetts Medical School as an Assistant Professor in the Program of Gene Function and Expression in the spring of 2003. In 2008 he was promoted to Associate Professor. He is a recipient of a 2007 W. M. Keck Foundation Distinguished Young Scholar in Medical Research Award, and the 2011 ASBMB Young Investigator Award.

     Link to Dekker Lab website

 

Spatial Organization of Genomes

Photo: Job Dekker, PhDWe study how a genome is organized in three dimensions inside the nucleus.  The spatial organization of a genome plays important roles in regulation of genes and maintenance of genome stability.  Many diseases, including cancer, are characterized by alterations in the spatial organization of the genome.  How genomes are organized in three dimensions, and how this affects gene expression is poorly understood.  To address this issue we study the genomes of human and yeast, using a set of powerful molecular and genomic tools that we developed.

From linear sequence to three-dimensional organization

Although the DNA of chromosomes is a linear sequence, the living genome does not function in a linear fashion.  This is most clearly illustrated by the fact that genes are often regulated by elements that can be located far away along the genome sequence. Recent evidence shows that regulatory elements can act over large genomic distances by engaging in direct physical interactions with target genes, resulting in the formation of chromatin loops.  Based on these observations we have proposed that the spatial organization of the genome resembles a three-dimensional network that is driven by physical associations between genes and regulatory elements, both in cis (along the same chromosome) and in trans (between different chromosomes) (Dekker (2006), Nature Methods, 3(1): 17-21).

How does the spatial organization of a genome relate to its regulation and function?

In each cell type a distinct set of genes is expressed and therefore the spatial organization of the genome will likely be cell-type specific.  Insights into the mechanisms that modulate the spatial organization of the genome will greatly contribute to a better understanding of tissue-specific gene regulation and may reveal causes of human diseases that are due to defects in these processes.

In order to understand the spatial organization of a genome we try to answer the following questions.  Which regulatory elements interact with each of the genes in the human genome?  What drives the specificity of these interactions?  Can we identify proteins that mediate these interactions?  How do interactions between regulatory elements and genes result in activation and repression of genes?  How do defects in these interactions result in human disease?  Can we use information about chromatin interactions to generate three-dimensional models of chromosomes?

Tools we developed for mapping the spatial organization of genomes: 3C, 5C and Hi-C

We developed Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C), which is used to detect physical interactions between genomic elements (Dekker et al. Science, 2002).  Using 3C we, and others, discovered that gene regulation is mediated by the three-dimensional organization of chromosomes that brings genes and their regulatory elements in close spatial proximity.  3C is now widely used and already has had a major impact on studies of genome regulation.

Large-scale detection of long-range chromatin interactions will be instrumental in mapping genome-wide networks of communication between genomic elements and the determination of the three-dimensional folding of the genome.  My group was the first to combine 3C with ultra-high-throughput DNA sequencing, thereby dramatically increasing the scale at which interactions between genomic loci can be studied.  Specifically, we have developed 5C, a high-throughput version of 3C for large-scale mapping of chromatin interaction networks (Dostie et al. Genome Res. 2006).  To enable the community to adopt 5C and related technologies we have developed "my5C", a publicly available set of computational tools for design of 5C studies and for visualization and analysis of any large chromatin interaction data sets (my5C.umassmed.edu; Lajoie et al. Nature Methods 2009).

Ultimately we aim to obtain detailed insights into the three-dimensional arrangements of complete genomes at Kb resolution.  To this end we recently developed the Hi-C technology: a genome-wide and unbiased method that combines 3C with deep sequencing (Lieberman-Aiden, van Berkum et al. Science 2009).  We have applied Hi-C to generate the first comprehensive and unbiased long-range interaction maps of the human genome.  Hi-C data reveal both known hallmarks of nuclear organization (e.g. formation of chromosome territories, and preferred co-location of particular pairs of chromosomes) as well as novel folding principles of chromosomes.  First, we found that the human genome is divided over two types of spatial compartments, one containing active chromatin, and one containing all inactive segments of the genome.  Second, we discovered a novel higher order chromatin folding motif: at the megabase scale, our data are consistent with a model in which chromatin is described by a polymer state known as the fractal globule: a knot-free conformation that enables maximally dense packing while preserving the ability to easily fold and unfold any genomic locus.   This conformation is an extremely efficient solution for packing long chromosomes inside the nucleus.  Hi-C data for GM06990 lymphoblastoid cells and for K562 erythroleukemia cells is available in a user friendly format at our website: http://hic.umassmed.edu.

Chromatin looping in the human beta-globin locus

The human beta-globin locus consists of five beta-globin-like genes (e, Ag, Gg, d and b) and one beta-globin pseudogene (y).  These genes are developmentally regulated by a single element, the Locus Control Region (LCR) located upstream of the gene cluster.  This locus has served as a powerful model system to study long-range gene regulation.  The LCR was found to directly interact with the expressed beta-globin-like genes resulting in the formation of large chromatin loops.  For instance in K562 cells, that express high levels of g-globin, we found that the LCR strongly interacts with the g-globin genes but not with the other beta-globin-like genes (Dostie et al. (2006), Genome Research, 16(10): 1299-1309).  Interestingly, the LCR also interacts with a genomic element located downstream of the globin genes, although the role of this interaction is currently unclear.  A schematic representation of these looping interactions is presented in Figure 2. 

We continue to study the human beta-globin locus to understand the molecular and biochemical mechanisms that drive developmental dynamics of long-range gene regulation.

Three-dimensional organization of chromosomes and chromatin domains

As a first step towards studying the spatial organization of entire chromosomes we have used 3C to determine the three-dimensional structure of yeast chromosome III (Dekker et al. (2002), Science, 295: 1306-1311).  We generated a matrix of interaction frequencies and developed mathematical tools to determine a population-average three-dimensional model of this ~320 kb chromosome based on the pattern of chromatin interactions (Figure 3).  Chromosome III emerged as a contorted ring, due to prominent interactions between the sub-telomeric regions. 

We have also analyzed the effect of gene activation on the general organization of a 150 kb chromatin domain around the FMR1 gene on the human X-chromosome.  We found that gene activation results in chromatin decondensation throughout a surprisingly large 50 kb region surrounding the active promoter (Gheldof et al. (2006), PNAS 103(33): 12463-12468). The molecular mechanisms that drive these large-scale conformational changes are currently being studied.

We continue to employ 3C and 5C to study the overall spatial organization of chromosomes and chromosome domains in yeast and human cells.

For more information on the work in my laboratory, please see our lab website at http://my5c.umassmed.edu/welcome/welcome.php

Figures

Chromosome Conformation Capture

Figure 1.   (a) Genes (blue rectangles) and regulatory elements (red circles) are linearly organized along chromosomes (top), but as a result of specific interactions between elements (indicated by arrows, both in cis and in trans) a complex three-dimensional network is formed inside the cell (bottom).  (b) Schematic representation of the 3C assay.  Chromatin is cross-linked, digested with a restriction enzyme and then ligated.  Specific ligation products can be detected by PCR.  [Figure from Dekker (2006), Nature Methods, 3(1): 17-21].

 

 

The human beta-globin locus

Figure 2.   Schematic representation of the human beta-globin locus.  Activation of the g-globin genes in K562 cells involves interactions between the LCR and the activated genes resulting in a large (~40 kb) chromatin loop.  The LCR also interacts with an element located downstream of the locus (3’HS1).

 

 

Spatial organization of yeast chromosome III

Figure 3. Spatial organization of yeast chromosome III (~ 320 kb) as determined by Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C). 3C was applied to determine the frequency with which several loci along the chromosome interact.  Interaction frequencies were then used to model the average spatial organization of the chromosome.  Interactions between the telomeres result in the formation of a ring-like structure with a diameter of around 300 nm.

 

Laboratory Personnel

Sharon Briggs, Financial Assistant, Grant & Contract Specialist
Jon-Matthew Belton, Graduate Student
Johan Gibcus, Postdoctoral Fellow
Gaurav Jain, Bioinformatician Level I
Bryan Lajoie, Bioinformatician Level II
Rachel McCord, Postdoctoral Fellow
Natalia Naumova, Postdoctoral Fellow
Amartya Sanyal, Postdoctoral Fellow
Emily Smith, Graduate Student
Ye Zhan, Research Associate

Publications
1. McCord RP, Dekker J. Translocation mapping exposes the risky lifestyle of B cells. Cell. 2011 Sep 30; 147(1):20-2.
  View in: PubMed
 
2. Sanyal A, Baù D, Martí-Renom MA, Dekker J. Chromatin globules: a common motif of higher order chromosome structure? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011 Jun; 23(3):325-31.
  View in: PubMed
 
3. Wang KC, Yang YW, Liu B, Sanyal A, Corces-Zimmerman R, Chen Y, Lajoie BR, Protacio A, Flynn RA, Gupta RA, Wysocka J, Lei M, Dekker J, Helms JA, Chang HY. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature. 2011 Apr 7; 472(7341):120-4.
  View in: PubMed
 
4. Kim KP, Weiner BM, Zhang L, Jordan A, Dekker J, Kleckner N. Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell. 2010 Dec 10; 143(6):924-37.
  View in: PubMed
 
5. Baù D, Sanyal A, Lajoie BR, Capriotti E, Byron M, Lawrence JB, Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA. The three-dimensional folding of the a-globin gene domain reveals formation of chromatin globules. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Jan; 18(1):107-14.
  View in: PubMed
 
6. Kagey MH, Newman JJ, Bilodeau S, Zhan Y, Orlando DA, van Berkum NL, Ebmeier CC, Goossens J, Rahl PB, Levine SS, Taatjes DJ, Dekker J, Young RA. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature. 2010 Sep 23; 467(7314):430-5.
  View in: PubMed
 
7. Bradner JE, Mak R, Tanguturi SK, Mazitschek R, Haggarty SJ, Ross K, Chang CY, Bosco J, West N, Morse E, Lin K, Shen JP, Kwiatkowski NP, Gheldof N, Dekker J, DeAngelo DJ, Carr SA, Schreiber SL, Golub TR, Ebert BL. Chemical genetic strategy identifies histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC2 as therapeutic targets in sickle cell disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13; 107(28):12617-22.
  View in: PubMed
 
8. Naumova N, Dekker J. Integrating one-dimensional and three-dimensional maps of genomes. J Cell Sci. 2010 Jun 15; 123(Pt 12):1979-88.
  View in: PubMed
 
9. van Berkum NL, Lieberman-Aiden E, Williams L, Imakaev M, Gnirke A, Mirny LA, Dekker J, Lander ES. Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes. J Vis Exp. 2010; (39).
  View in: PubMed
 
10. Gheldof N, Smith EM, Tabuchi TM, Koch CM, Dunham I, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dekker J. Cell-type-specific long-range looping interactions identify distant regulatory elements of the CFTR gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul; 38(13):4325-36.
  View in: PubMed
 
11. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender MA, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny LA, Lander ES, Dekker J. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009 Oct 9; 326(5950):289-93.
  View in: PubMed
 
12. Lajoie BR, van Berkum NL, Sanyal A, Dekker J. My5C: web tools for chromosome conformation capture studies. Nat Methods. 2009 Oct; 6(10):690-1.
  View in: PubMed
 
13. D'haene B, Attanasio C, Beysen D, Dostie J, Lemire E, Bouchard P, Field M, Jones K, Lorenz B, Menten B, Buysse K, Pattyn F, Friedli M, Ucla C, Rossier C, Wyss C, Speleman F, De Paepe A, Dekker J, Antonarakis SE, De Baere E. Disease-causing 7.4 kb cis-regulatory deletion disrupting conserved non-coding sequences and their interaction with the FOXL2 promotor: implications for mutation screening. PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000522.
  View in: PubMed
 
14. Chang HY, Cuvier O, Dekker J. Gene dates, parties and galas. Symposium on Chromatin Dynamics and Higher Order Organization. EMBO Rep. 2009 Jul; 10(7):689-93.
  View in: PubMed
 
15. Miele A, Bystricky K, Dekker J. Yeast silent mating type loci form heterochromatic clusters through silencer protein-dependent long-range interactions. PLoS Genet. 2009 May; 5(5):e1000478.
  View in: PubMed
 
16. Oza P, Jaspersen SL, Miele A, Dekker J, Peterson CL. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev. 2009 Apr 15; 23(8):912-27.
  View in: PubMed
 
17. Miele A, Dekker J. Mapping cis- and trans- chromatin interaction networks using chromosome conformation capture (3C). Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 464:105-21.
  View in: PubMed
 
18. van Berkum NL, Dekker J. Determining spatial chromatin organization of large genomic regions using 5C technology. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 567:189-213.
  View in: PubMed
 
19. Dekker J. Mapping in vivo chromatin interactions in yeast suggests an extended chromatin fiber with regional variation in compaction. J Biol Chem. 2008 Dec 12; 283(50):34532-40.
  View in: PubMed
 
20. Miele A, Dekker J. Long-range chromosomal interactions and gene regulation. Mol Biosyst. 2008 Nov; 4(11):1046-57.
  View in: PubMed
 
21. Dekker J. Gene regulation in the third dimension. Science. 2008 Mar 28; 319(5871):1793-4.
  View in: PubMed
 
22. Keys JR, Tallack MR, Zhan Y, Papathanasiou P, Goodnow CC, Gaensler KM, Crossley M, Dekker J, Perkins AC. A mechanism for Ikaros regulation of human globin gene switching. Br J Haematol. 2008 May; 141(3):398-406.
  View in: PubMed
 
23. Dostie J, Zhan Y, Dekker J. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy technology. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2007 Oct; Chapter 21:Unit 21.14.
  View in: PubMed
 
24. Lanzuolo C, Roure V, Dekker J, Bantignies F, Orlando V. Polycomb response elements mediate the formation of chromosome higher-order structures in the bithorax complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Oct; 9(10):1167-74.
  View in: PubMed
 
25. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007 Jun 14; 447(7146):799-816.
  View in: PubMed
 
26. Dekker J. GC- and AT-rich chromatin domains differ in conformation and histone modification status and are differentially modulated by Rpd3p. Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R116.
  View in: PubMed
 
27. Hagège H, Klous P, Braem C, Splinter E, Dekker J, Cathala G, de Laat W, Forné T. Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(7):1722-33.
  View in: PubMed
 
28. Dostie J, Dekker J. Mapping networks of physical interactions between genomic elements using 5C technology. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(4):988-1002.
  View in: PubMed
 
29. Dostie J, Richmond TA, Arnaout RA, Selzer RR, Lee WL, Honan TA, Rubio ED, Krumm A, Lamb J, Nusbaum C, Green RD, Dekker J. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 2006 Oct; 16(10):1299-309.
  View in: PubMed
 
30. Gheldof N, Tabuchi TM, Dekker J. The active FMR1 promoter is associated with a large domain of altered chromatin conformation with embedded local histone modifications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15; 103(33):12463-8.
  View in: PubMed
 
31. Miele A, Gheldof N, Tabuchi TM, Dostie J, Dekker J. Mapping chromatin interactions by chromosome conformation capture. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2006 May; Chapter 21:Unit 21.11.
  View in: PubMed
 
32. Dekker J. The three 'C' s of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls. Nat Methods. 2006 Jan; 3(1):17-21.
  View in: PubMed
 
33. Vakoc CR, Letting DL, Gheldof N, Sawado T, Bender MA, Groudine M, Weiss MJ, Dekker J, Blobel GA. Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the beta-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. Mol Cell. 2005 Feb 4; 17(3):453-62.
  View in: PubMed
 
34. Kleckner N, Zickler D, Jones GH, Dekker J, Padmore R, Henle J, Hutchinson J. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 24; 101(34):12592-7.
  View in: PubMed
 
35. Dekker J. A closer look at long-range chromosomal interactions. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003 Jun; 28(6):277-80.
  View in: PubMed
 
36. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 2002 Feb 15; 295(5558):1306-11.
  View in: PubMed
 
For assistance with using Profiles, please refer to the online tutorials at http://inside.umassmed.edu/is/profiles.aspx or contact the UMMS Help Desk at UMWHelpDesk@umassmed.edu or 508-856-8643.
 
Keyword
Last Name
Institution
    
 
 
 
Keywords   
Chromatin
Chromosomes
Nucleic Acid Conformation
Genomics
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
See all (168) keywords
Co-Authors  
Newburger, Peter
Peterson, Craig
Weng, Zhiping
See all (3) people
Physical Neighbors  
Shcherbakova, Inna
Knight, Kendall
Zeldovich, Konstantin
Kathuria, Sagar
Wolfe, Scot

UMMS Home

Intranet

This is an official Page/Publication of the University of Massachusetts Worcester Campus
Office of the Vice Provost for Research, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
Questions or Comments? Email: publicaffairs@umassmed.edu Phone: 508-856-1572