"Ethics Committees" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Committees established by professional societies, health facilities, or other institutions to consider decisions that have bioethical implications. The role of these committees may include consultation, education, mediation, and/or review of policies and practices. Committees that consider the ethical dimensions of patient care are ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL; committees established to protect the welfare of research subjects are ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH.
- Ethics Committees
- Committee, Ethics
- Committees, Ethics
- Ethics Committee
Regional Ethics Committees
- Regional Ethics Committees
- Committee, Regional Ethics
- Committees, Regional Ethics
- Ethics Committee, Regional
- Ethics Committees, Regional
- Regional Ethics Committee
Institutional Ethics Committees
- Institutional Ethics Committees
- Committee, Institutional Ethics
- Committees, Institutional Ethics
- Ethics Committee, Institutional
- Ethics Committees, Institutional
- Institutional Ethics Committee
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Ethics Committees".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Ethics Committees".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Ethics Committees" by people in this website by year, and whether "Ethics Committees" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
|Year||Major Topic||Minor Topic||Total|
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Ethics Committees" by people in Profiles.
Lidz CW, Simon LJ, Seligowski AV, Myers S, Gardner W, Candilis PJ, Arnold R, Appelbaum PS. The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb; 7(1):1-6.
Silverman J. A questionable citation and appeal. Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Jan; 39(1):7.
Silverman J, Guhad FA, Guaraldi M, Scott-Emuakpor J, Smith SL. Alternate IACUC members: when is the regular member "unavailable"? Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Mar; 33(3):17.
Parker LS, Lidz CW. Familial coercion to participate in genetic family studies: is there cause for IRB intervention? IRB. 1994 Jan-Apr; 16(1-2):6-12.
Candilis PJ, Wesley RW, Wichman A. A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects. IRB. 1993 Nov-Dec; 15(6):1-4.
Grisso T, Baldwin E, Blanck PD, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Schooler NR, Thompson T. Standards in research: APA's mechanism for monitoring the challenges. Am Psychol. 1991 Jul; 46(7):758-66.
Mitchell SC, Steingrub J. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB. IRB. 1988 Jul-Aug; 10(4):1-5.
Geller JL, Lidz CW, Pattulo EL. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent? IRB. 1987 Sep-Oct; 9(5):4-8.
Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade WJ. Informed consent in psychiatric research. Rutgers Law Rev. 1987 Winter-Spring; 39(2-3):425-41.
Shannon TA, Ockene IS, Levine RJ. Approving high risk, rejecting low risk: the case of two cases. IRB. 1985 Jan-Feb; 7(1):6-8.