Concepts (66)
Concepts are derived automatically from a person's publications.
Concepts are listed by decreasing relevance which is based on many factors, including how many publications the person wrote about that topic, how long ago those publications were written, and how many publications other people have written on that same topic.
| Name |
Number of Publications
|
Most Recent Publication
|
Publications by All Authors
|
Concept Score
|
Why?
|
|---|
| Myocardial Perfusion Imaging | 4 | 2023 | 53 | 0.740 |
Why?
|
| Radiopharmaceuticals | 5 | 2019 | 192 | 0.570 |
Why?
|
| Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon | 11 | 2023 | 202 | 0.550 |
Why?
|
| Organotechnetium Compounds | 2 | 2009 | 28 | 0.360 |
Why?
|
| Perfusion | 2 | 2009 | 73 | 0.360 |
Why?
|
| Myocardium | 2 | 2009 | 298 | 0.310 |
Why?
|
| Technetium | 1 | 2009 | 68 | 0.300 |
Why?
|
| Coronary Artery Disease | 2 | 2009 | 326 | 0.270 |
Why?
|
| Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi | 3 | 2019 | 34 | 0.230 |
Why?
|
| Coronary Circulation | 2 | 2003 | 55 | 0.200 |
Why?
|
| Collateral Circulation | 1 | 2003 | 26 | 0.190 |
Why?
|
| Vasodilator Agents | 1 | 2003 | 72 | 0.190 |
Why?
|
| ROC Curve | 4 | 2023 | 294 | 0.180 |
Why?
|
| Cardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted Tomography | 2 | 2013 | 10 | 0.180 |
Why?
|
| Coronary Disease | 1 | 2003 | 248 | 0.180 |
Why?
|
| Heart Diseases | 2 | 2017 | 226 | 0.160 |
Why?
|
| Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography | 1 | 2019 | 11 | 0.150 |
Why?
|
| Artifacts | 2 | 2017 | 127 | 0.140 |
Why?
|
| Imaging, Three-Dimensional | 2 | 2013 | 301 | 0.130 |
Why?
|
| Respiratory Mechanics | 1 | 2017 | 56 | 0.130 |
Why?
|
| Cardiology | 2 | 2009 | 170 | 0.120 |
Why?
|
| Ventricular Dysfunction, Left | 2 | 2007 | 168 | 0.120 |
Why?
|
| Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | 3 | 2023 | 694 | 0.110 |
Why?
|
| Prognosis | 3 | 2009 | 1792 | 0.100 |
Why?
|
| Heart Ventricles | 3 | 2013 | 267 | 0.090 |
Why?
|
| Heart | 2 | 2023 | 295 | 0.090 |
Why?
|
| Respiration | 1 | 2010 | 93 | 0.080 |
Why?
|
| Kinetics | 2 | 2009 | 769 | 0.080 |
Why?
|
| Movement | 1 | 2010 | 163 | 0.080 |
Why?
|
| Cardiac Volume | 1 | 2007 | 7 | 0.070 |
Why?
|
| Gated Blood-Pool Imaging | 1 | 2007 | 11 | 0.070 |
Why?
|
| Nuclear Medicine | 1 | 2007 | 9 | 0.070 |
Why?
|
| Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional | 1 | 2007 | 46 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Oximes | 1 | 2006 | 11 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Humans | 14 | 2023 | 65676 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Phantoms, Imaging | 2 | 2023 | 232 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Quality Assurance, Health Care | 1 | 2006 | 260 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Stroke Volume | 1 | 2006 | 337 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Algorithms | 2 | 2006 | 1048 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Image Enhancement | 1 | 2005 | 194 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted | 1 | 2005 | 186 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Practice Guidelines as Topic | 1 | 2007 | 739 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Electrocardiography | 1 | 2003 | 560 | 0.040 |
Why?
|
| Aged, 80 and over | 2 | 2019 | 5621 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Young Adult | 2 | 2019 | 4860 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Motion | 1 | 2017 | 65 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Male | 6 | 2019 | 31137 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Aged | 3 | 2019 | 14965 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Observer Variation | 2 | 2007 | 215 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Middle Aged | 4 | 2019 | 18314 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Female | 6 | 2019 | 34182 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Risk Assessment | 1 | 2003 | 2098 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Sex Factors | 1 | 2017 | 995 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Radiation Dosage | 1 | 2013 | 140 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Reproducibility of Results | 2 | 2007 | 1706 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Time Factors | 2 | 2010 | 3782 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Adult | 2 | 2019 | 17481 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Animals | 1 | 2009 | 21500 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Retrospective Studies | 1 | 2019 | 6901 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Computer-Aided Design | 1 | 2006 | 28 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Patient Selection | 1 | 2007 | 488 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Models, Theoretical | 1 | 2006 | 274 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| United States | 2 | 2007 | 8149 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Scattering, Radiation | 1 | 2003 | 72 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Exercise Test | 1 | 2005 | 257 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Practice Patterns, Physicians' | 1 | 2007 | 716 | 0.010 |
Why?
|