Header Logo

Connection

Charles Lidz to Ethics, Research

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about Ethics, Research.
Connection Strength

1.858
  1. Lidz CW, Albert K, Appelbaum P, Dunn LB, Overton E, Pivovarova E. Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Apr; 24(2):231-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.467
  2. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, Albert K, Rosenbaum J, Simon L. Competing commitments in clinical trials. IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct; 31(5):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.317
  3. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr; 38(2):5-6; author reply 6-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  4. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. Clinical ethics versus clinical research. Am J Bioeth. 2006 Jul-Aug; 6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  5. Murray A, Pivovarova E, Klitzman R, Stiles DF, Appelbaum P, Lidz CW. Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar; 12(1):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  6. Klitzman R, Pivovarova E, Lidz CW. Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy. JAMA. 2017 05 23; 317(20):2061-2062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  7. Lawrence RE, Albert K, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. Competing commitments in psychiatric research: an examination of psychiatric researchers' perspectives. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Sep-Dec; 35(5-6):380-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  8. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R. Voluntariness of consent to research: a preliminary empirical investigation. IRB. 2009 Nov-Dec; 31(6):10-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  9. Silverman J, Lidz CW, Clayfield J, Murray A, Simon LJ, Maranda L. Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):209-216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  10. Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hartwig KC. Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr; 26(2):244-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.