Loading...
Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Connection

Charles Lidz to Adult

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about Adult.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.566
 
  1. Christopher PP, Appelbaum PS, Truong D, Albert K, Maranda L, Lidz C. Reducing therapeutic misconception: A randomized intervention trial in hypothetical clinical trials. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184224.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  2. Christopher PP, Stein MD, Johnson JE, Rich JD, Friedmann PD, Clarke J, Lidz CW. Exploitation of Prisoners in Clinical Research: Perceptions of Study Participants. IRB. 2016 Jan-Feb; 38(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  3. Appelbaum PS, Anatchkova M, Albert K, Dunn LB, Lidz CW. Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measure. Clin Trials. 2012 Dec; 9(6):748-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  4. Lidz CW, Simon LJ, Seligowski AV, Myers S, Gardner W, Candilis PJ, Arnold R, Appelbaum PS. The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb; 7(1):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  5. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, Albert K, Rosenbaum J, Simon L. Competing commitments in clinical trials. IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct; 31(5):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  6. Skeem JL, Schubert C, Odgers C, Mulvey EP, Gardner W, Lidz C. Psychiatric symptoms and community violence among high-risk patients: A test of the relationship at the weekly level. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct; 74(5):967-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  7. Mulvey EP, Odgers C, Skeem J, Gardner W, Schubert C, Lidz C. Substance use and community violence: a test of the relation at the daily level. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Aug; 74(4):743-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. Skeem JL, Mulvey EP, Odgers C, Schubert C, Stowman S, Gardner W, Lidz C. What do clinicians expect? Comparing envisioned and reported violence for male and female patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Aug; 73(4):599-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  9. Skeem J, Schubert C, Stowman S, Beeson S, Mulvey E, Gardner W, Lidz C. Gender and risk assessment accuracy: underestimating women's violence potential. Law Hum Behav. 2005 Apr; 29(2):173-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  10. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May; 58(9):1689-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  11. Lidz CW, Coontz PD, Mulvey EP. The "pass-through" model of psychiatric emergency room assessment. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000 Jan-Feb; 23(1):43-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  12. Skeem JL, Manchak SM, Lidz CW, Mulvey EP. The utility of patients' self-perceptions of violence risk: consider asking the person who may know best. Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1; 64(5):410-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  13. Odgers CL, Mulvey EP, Skeem JL, Gardner W, Lidz CW, Schubert C. Capturing the ebb and flow of psychiatric symptoms with dynamical systems models. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 May; 166(5):575-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Candilis PJ, Fletcher KE, Geppert CM, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. A direct comparison of research decision-making capacity: schizophrenia/schizoaffective, medically ill, and non-ill subjects. Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb; 99(1-3):350-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  15. Candilis PJ, Geppert CM, Fletcher KE, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. Willingness of subjects with thought disorder to participate in research. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan; 32(1):159-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  16. Schubert CA, Mulvey EP, Lidz CW, Gardner WP, Skeem JL. Weekly community interviews with high-risk participants: operational issues. J Interpers Violence. 2005 May; 20(5):632-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  17. Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hartwig KC. Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr; 26(2):244-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.