Loading...
Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Connection

Charles Lidz to Comprehension

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about Comprehension.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.589
 
  1. Lidz CW, Albert K, Appelbaum P, Dunn LB, Overton E, Pivovarova E. Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Apr; 24(2):231-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  2. Ness DE, Kiesling SF, Lidz CW. Why does informed consent fail? A discourse analytic approach. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009; 37(3):349-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  3. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr; 38(2):5-6; author reply 6-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  4. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Correction and clarification. IRB. 2004 Sep-Oct; 26(5):18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  5. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB. 2004 Mar-Apr; 26(2):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  6. Benson PR, Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Winslade WJ. Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research. Law Hum Behav. 1988 Dec; 12(4):455-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  7. Candilis PJ, Fletcher KE, Geppert CM, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. A direct comparison of research decision-making capacity: schizophrenia/schizoaffective, medically ill, and non-ill subjects. Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb; 99(1-3):350-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Roth L, Lidz CW, Meisel A, Soloff PH, Kaufman K, Spiker DG, Foster FG. Competency to decide about treatment or research: an overview of some empirical data. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982; 5:29-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  9. Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade WJ. Informed consent in psychiatric research. Rutgers Law Rev. 1987 Winter-Spring; 39(2-3):425-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.