Loading...
Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Connection

Charles Lidz to Middle Aged

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about Middle Aged.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.354
 
  1. Christopher PP, Appelbaum PS, Truong D, Albert K, Maranda L, Lidz C. Reducing therapeutic misconception: A randomized intervention trial in hypothetical clinical trials. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184224.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  2. Christopher PP, Stein MD, Johnson JE, Rich JD, Friedmann PD, Clarke J, Lidz CW. Exploitation of Prisoners in Clinical Research: Perceptions of Study Participants. IRB. 2016 Jan-Feb; 38(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  3. Appelbaum PS, Anatchkova M, Albert K, Dunn LB, Lidz CW. Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measure. Clin Trials. 2012 Dec; 9(6):748-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  4. Lidz CW, Simon LJ, Seligowski AV, Myers S, Gardner W, Candilis PJ, Arnold R, Appelbaum PS. The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb; 7(1):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  5. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, Albert K, Rosenbaum J, Simon L. Competing commitments in clinical trials. IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct; 31(5):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  6. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May; 58(9):1689-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  7. Candilis PJ, Fletcher KE, Geppert CM, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. A direct comparison of research decision-making capacity: schizophrenia/schizoaffective, medically ill, and non-ill subjects. Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb; 99(1-3):350-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  8. Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hartwig KC. Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr; 26(2):244-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.