Loading...
Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Connection

Charles Lidz to United States

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about United States.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.856
 
  1. Christopher PP, Stein MD, Johnson JE, Rich JD, Friedmann PD, Clarke J, Lidz CW. Exploitation of Prisoners in Clinical Research: Perceptions of Study Participants. IRB. 2016 Jan-Feb; 38(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  2. Lidz CW, Garverich S. What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform. J Law Med Ethics. 2013; 41(2):390-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  3. DuBois JM, Beskow L, Campbell J, Dugosh K, Festinger D, Hartz S, James R, Lidz C. Restoring balance: a consensus statement on the protection of vulnerable research participants. Am J Public Health. 2012 Dec; 102(12):2220-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  4. Silverman J, Baker SP, Lidz CW. A self-assessment survey of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, part 2: structure and organizational functions. Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Oct; 41(10):289-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  5. Silverman J, Baker SP, Lidz CW. A self-assessment survey of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Part 1: animal welfare and protocol compliance. Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Aug; 41(8):230-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  6. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Arnold R, Candilis P, Gardner W, Myers S, Simon L. How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule? Acad Med. 2012 Jul; 87(7):969-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  7. Lidz CW, Simon LJ, Seligowski AV, Myers S, Gardner W, Candilis PJ, Arnold R, Appelbaum PS. The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb; 7(1):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  8. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, Albert K, Rosenbaum J, Simon L. Competing commitments in clinical trials. IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct; 31(5):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  9. Lidz CW. The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent. Behav Sci Law. 2006; 24(4):535-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  10. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May; 58(9):1689-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  11. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care. 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V55-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  12. Lidz CW, Coontz PD, Mulvey EP. The "pass-through" model of psychiatric emergency room assessment. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000 Jan-Feb; 23(1):43-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  13. Lawrence RE, Albert K, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. Competing commitments in psychiatric research: an examination of psychiatric researchers' perspectives. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Sep-Dec; 35(5-6):380-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  14. Candilis PJ, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Arnold RM, Gardner W, Myers S, Grudzinskas AJ, Simon LJ. The silent majority: who speaks at IRB meetings? IRB. 2012 Jul-Aug; 34(4):15-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  15. Simon LJ, Bizamcer AN, Lidz CW, Stefan S, Pletcher MJ. Disparities in opioid prescribing for patients with psychiatric diagnoses presenting with pain to the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2012 Mar; 29(3):201-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  16. Candilis PJ, Lidz CW, Arnold RM. The need to understand IRB deliberations. IRB. 2006 Jan-Feb; 28(1):1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. Schubert CA, Mulvey EP, Lidz CW, Gardner WP, Skeem JL. Weekly community interviews with high-risk participants: operational issues. J Interpers Violence. 2005 May; 20(5):632-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  18. Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade WJ. Informed consent in psychiatric research. Rutgers Law Rev. 1987 Winter-Spring; 39(2-3):425-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.