Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Donald Fisher and Elizabeth Henneman.
Connection Strength
0.788
-
Henneman EA, Marquard JL, Fisher DL, Gawlinski A. Eye Tracking: A Novel Approach for Evaluating and Improving the Safety of Healthcare Processes in the Simulated Setting. Simul Healthc. 2017 Feb; 12(1):51-56.
Score: 0.158
-
Amster B, Marquard J, Henneman E, Fisher D. Using an eye tracker during medication administration to identify gaps in nursing students' contextual knowledge: an observational study. Nurse Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr; 40(2):83-6.
Score: 0.138
-
Henneman EA, Cunningham H, Fisher DL, Plotkin K, Nathanson BH, Roche JP, Marquard JL, Reilly CA, Henneman PL. Eye tracking as a debriefing mechanism in the simulated setting improves patient safety practices. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014 May-Jun; 33(3):129-35.
Score: 0.130
-
Henneman PL, Marquard JL, Fisher DL, Bleil J, Walsh B, Henneman JP, Blank FS, Higgins AM, Nathanson BH, Henneman EA. Bar-code verification: reducing but not eliminating medication errors. J Nurs Adm. 2012 Dec; 42(12):562-6.
Score: 0.118
-
Marquard JL, Henneman PL, He Z, Jo J, Fisher DL, Henneman EA. Nurses' behaviors and visual scanning patterns may reduce patient identification errors. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Sep; 17(3):247-56.
Score: 0.108
-
Henneman EA, Roche JP, Fisher DL, Cunningham H, Reilly CA, Nathanson BH, Henneman PL. Error identification and recovery by student nurses using human patient simulation: opportunity to improve patient safety. Appl Nurs Res. 2010 Feb; 23(1):11-21.
Score: 0.090
-
Henneman PL, Fisher DL, Henneman EA, Pham TA, Campbell MM, Nathanson BH. Patient identification errors are common in a simulated setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun; 55(6):503-9.
Score: 0.024
-
Henneman PL, Fisher DL, Henneman EA, Pham TA, Mei YY, Talati R, Nathanson BH, Roche J. Providers do not verify patient identity during computer order entry. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul; 15(7):641-8.
Score: 0.022