Donald Fisher to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Donald Fisher has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.514
-
Epstein JN, Garner AA, Kiefer AW, Peugh J, Tamm L, Lynch JD, MacPherson RP, Simon JO, Fisher DL. Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training. Hum Factors. 2025 Jan; 67(1):49-62.
Score: 0.035
-
Fisher DL, Agrawal R, Divekar G, Hamid MA, Krishnan A, Mehranian H, Muttart J, Pradhan A, Roberts S, Romoser M, Samuel S, Vlakveld W, Yamani Y, Young J, Zafian T, Zhang L. Novice driver crashes: The relation between putative causal factors, countermeasures, real world implementations, and policy - A case study in simple, scalable solutions. Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Apr; 198:107397.
Score: 0.035
-
Roberts SC, Hanson W, Ebadi Y, Talreja N, Knodler MA, Fisher DL. Evaluation of a 3M (mistakes, mentoring, and mastery) training program for transfer of control situations in a level 2 automated driving system. Appl Ergon. 2024 Apr; 116:104215.
Score: 0.035
-
Epstein JN, Garner AA, Kiefer AW, Peugh J, Tamm L, MacPherson RP, Simon JO, Fisher DL. Trial of Training to Reduce Driver Inattention in Teens with ADHD. N Engl J Med. 2022 12 01; 387(22):2056-2066.
Score: 0.032
-
Ebadi Y, Helm A, Hungund AP, Roberts SC, McDermott JM, Epstein JN, Fisher DL. Impact of L2 automated systems on hazard anticipation and mitigation behavior of young drivers with varying levels of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder symptomatology. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep; 159:106292.
Score: 0.029
-
Wright TJ, Agrawal R, Samuel S, Wang Y, Zilberstein S, Fisher DL. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation. Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul; 116:14-20.
Score: 0.023
-
Yamani Y, Horrey WJ, Liang Y, Fisher DL. Age-Related Differences in Vehicle Control and Eye Movement Patterns at Intersections: Older and Middle-Aged Drivers. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164124.
Score: 0.021
-
Samuel S, Yamani Y, Fisher DL. Large reductions are possible in older driver crashes at intersections. Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Sep; 99(5):419-24.
Score: 0.021
-
Borowsky A, Horrey WJ, Liang Y, Garabet A, Simmons L, Fisher DL. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard. Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug; 93:207-216.
Score: 0.021
-
Strayer DL, Fisher DL. SPIDER: A Framework for Understanding Driver Distraction. Hum Factors. 2016 Feb; 58(1):5-12.
Score: 0.020
-
Fisher DL. Cognitive Distraction in the Wild: Next Steps-Addressing a Not-So-Humdrum Conundrum. Hum Factors. 2015 Dec; 57(8):1331-3.
Score: 0.020
-
Yamani Y, Samuel S, Knodler MA, Fisher DL. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a multi-skill program for training younger drivers on higher cognitive skills. Appl Ergon. 2016 Jan; 52:135-41.
Score: 0.020
-
Yamani Y, Horrey WJ, Liang Y, Fisher DL. Sequential in-vehicle glance distributions: an alternative approach for analyzing glance data. Hum Factors. 2015 Jun; 57(4):567-72.
Score: 0.019
-
Borowsky A, Horrey WJ, Liang Y, Garabet A, Simmons L, Fisher DL. The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015; 16(2):133-9.
Score: 0.018
-
Ouimet MC, Pradhan AK, Simons-Morton BG, Divekar G, Mehranian H, Fisher DL. The effect of male teenage passengers on male teenage drivers: findings from a driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep; 58:132-9.
Score: 0.017
-
Taylor T, Pradhan AK, Divekar G, Romoser M, Muttart J, Gomez R, Pollatsek A, Fisher DL. The view from the road: the contribution of on-road glance-monitoring technologies to understanding driver behavior. Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep; 58:175-86.
Score: 0.017
-
Fisher D, Garay-Vega L. Advance yield markings and drivers' performance in response to multiple-threat scenarios at mid-block crosswalks. Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jan; 44(1):35-41.
Score: 0.014
-
Romoser MR, Fisher DL. The effect of active versus passive training strategies on improving older drivers' scanning in intersections. Hum Factors. 2009 Oct; 51(5):652-68.
Score: 0.013
-
Pradhan AK, Pollatsek A, Knodler M, Fisher DL. Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous? Ergonomics. 2009 Jun; 52(6):657-73.
Score: 0.013
-
Fisher DL, Pollatsek AP, Pradhan A. Can novice drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their likelihood of a crash? Inj Prev. 2006 Jun; 12 Suppl 1:i25-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Pollatsek A, Narayanaan V, Pradhan A, Fisher DL. Using eye movements to evaluate a PC-based risk awareness and perception training program on a driving simulator. Hum Factors. 2006; 48(3):447-64.
Score: 0.010
-
Pradhan AK, Hammel KR, DeRamus R, Pollatsek A, Noyce DA, Fisher DL. Using eye movements to evaluate effects of driver age on risk perception in a driving simulator. Hum Factors. 2005; 47(4):840-52.
Score: 0.009
-
Lynch JD, Tamm L, Garner AA, Avion AA, Fisher DL, Kiefer AW, Peugh J, Simon JO, Epstein JN. Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Adverse Driving Outcomes in Teen Drivers With ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2023 12; 27(14):1650-1661.
Score: 0.009
-
Glassman J, Yahoodik S, Samuel S, Young J, Knodler MK, Zhang T, Zafian T, Fisher DL, Yamani Y. Booster Dose of Attention Training Program for Young Novice Drivers: A Longitudinal Driving Simulator Evaluation Study. Hum Factors. 2024 03; 66(3):933-953.
Score: 0.008
-
Fisher DL, Laurie NE, Glaser R, Connerney K, Pollatsek A, Duffy SA, Brock J. Use of a fixed-base driving simulator to evaluate the effects of experience and PC-based risk awareness training on drivers' decisions. Hum Factors. 2002; 44(2):287-302.
Score: 0.008
-
Roberts SC, Zhang F, Fisher D, Vaca FE. The effect of hazard awareness training on teen drivers of varying socioeconomic status. Traffic Inj Prev. 2021; 22(6):455-459.
Score: 0.007
-
Hajiseyedjavadi F, Zhang T, Agrawal R, Knodler M, Fisher D, Samuel S. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities. Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul; 116:41-52.
Score: 0.006
-
Henneman EA, Marquard JL, Fisher DL, Gawlinski A. Eye Tracking: A Novel Approach for Evaluating and Improving the Safety of Healthcare Processes in the Simulated Setting. Simul Healthc. 2017 Feb; 12(1):51-56.
Score: 0.005
-
Henneman EA, Cunningham H, Fisher DL, Plotkin K, Nathanson BH, Roche JP, Marquard JL, Reilly CA, Henneman PL. Eye tracking as a debriefing mechanism in the simulated setting improves patient safety practices. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014 May-Jun; 33(3):129-35.
Score: 0.004
-
Marquard JL, Henneman PL, He Z, Jo J, Fisher DL, Henneman EA. Nurses' behaviors and visual scanning patterns may reduce patient identification errors. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Sep; 17(3):247-56.
Score: 0.004
-
Hurwitz DS, Pradhan A, Fisher DL, Knodler MA, Muttart JW, Menon R, Meissner U. Backing collisions: a study of drivers' eye and backing behaviour using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems. Inj Prev. 2010 Apr; 16(2):79-84.
Score: 0.003
-
Henneman EA, Roche JP, Fisher DL, Cunningham H, Reilly CA, Nathanson BH, Henneman PL. Error identification and recovery by student nurses using human patient simulation: opportunity to improve patient safety. Appl Nurs Res. 2010 Feb; 23(1):11-21.
Score: 0.003
-
Schweickert R, Fisher DL, Proctor RW. Steps toward building mathematical and computer models from cognitive task analyses. Hum Factors. 2003; 45(1):77-103.
Score: 0.002
-
Katsikopoulos KV, Duse-Anthony Y, Fisher DL, Duffy SA. Risk attitude reversals in drivers' route choice when range of travel time information is provided. Hum Factors. 2002; 44(3):466-73.
Score: 0.002