Thomas Grisso to Expert Testimony
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Thomas Grisso has written about Expert Testimony.
Connection Strength
0.881
-
Leavitt N, Presskreischer H, Maykuth PL, Grisso T. Aggression toward forensic evaluators: a statewide survey. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006; 34(2):231-9.
Score: 0.268
-
Borum R, Grisso T. Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1996; 24(3):297-317.
Score: 0.134
-
Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Structuring the debate about ethical predictions of future violence. Law Hum Behav. 1993 Aug; 17(4):482-5.
Score: 0.113
-
Grisso T. The differences between forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993; 21(2):133-45.
Score: 0.109
-
Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence? Law Hum Behav. 1992 Dec; 16(6):621-33.
Score: 0.108
-
Hoge SK, Grisso T. Accuracy and expert testimony. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992; 20(1):67-76.
Score: 0.102
-
Anderten P, Staulcup V, Grisso T. On being ethical in legal places. Prof Psychol. 1980 Oct; 11(5):764-73.
Score: 0.047