Gina Vincent to Violence
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gina Vincent has written about Violence.
Connection Strength
3.223
-
Cohn JR, Perrault RT, Cicero DC, Vincent GM. The structured assessment of violence risk in youth demonstrates measurement invariance between Black and White justice-referred youths. Law Hum Behav. 2024 Oct-Dec; 48(5-6):415-426.
Score: 0.837
-
Vincent GM, Drawbridge D, Davis M. The validity of risk assessment instruments for transition-age youth. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Feb; 87(2):171-183.
Score: 0.559
-
Vincent GM, Guy LS, Gershenson BG, McCabe P. Does risk assessment make a difference? Results of implementing the SAVRY in juvenile probation. Behav Sci Law. 2012 Jul-Aug; 30(4):384-405.
Score: 0.357
-
Vincent GM, Guy LS, Fusco SL, Gershenson BG. Field reliability of the SAVRY with juvenile probation officers: Implications for training. Law Hum Behav. 2012 Jun; 36(3):225-36.
Score: 0.355
-
Viljoen JL, McLachlan K, Vincent GM. Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: a survey of clinical practices. Assessment. 2010 Sep; 17(3):377-95.
Score: 0.302
-
Vincent GM, Odgers CL, McCormick AV, Corrado RR. The PCL: YV and recidivism in male and female juveniles: a follow-up into young adulthood. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Jun-Jul; 31(3):287-96.
Score: 0.269
-
Vincent GM. Psychopathy and violence risk assessment in youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2006 Apr; 15(2):407-28, ix.
Score: 0.231
-
Grisso T, Vincent GM. The empirical limits of forensic mental health assessment. Law Hum Behav. 2005 Feb; 29(1):1-5.
Score: 0.213
-
Allen CH, Gullapalli AR, Milillo M, Ulrich DM, Rodriguez SN, Maurer JM, Aharoni E, Anderson NE, Harenski CL, Vincent GM, Kiehl KA. Psychopathy Scores Predict Recidivism in High-risk Youth: A Five-year Follow-up Study. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 07; 52(7):1089-1103.
Score: 0.050
-
Corrado RR, Vincent GM, Hart SD, Cohen IM. Predictive validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version for general and violent recidivism. Behav Sci Law. 2004; 22(1):5-22.
Score: 0.049