Katie Nason to Esophagectomy
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Katie Nason has written about Esophagectomy.
Connection Strength
4.999
-
Lu M, Luketich JD, Levy RM, Awais O, Sarkaria I, Visintainer P, Nason KS. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy: Influence of omentoplasty in propensity-weighted cohorts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 05; 159(5):2096-2105.
Score: 0.615
-
Tam V, Luketich JD, Winger DG, Sarkaria IS, Levy RM, Christie NA, Awais O, Shende MR, Nason KS. Cancer Recurrence After Esophagectomy: Impact of Postoperative Infection in Propensity-Matched Cohorts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov; 102(5):1638-1646.
Score: 0.486
-
Nason KS. Improving Quality: When Surgeons Take the Bit Between the Teeth, Patients Win! Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 28(1):170-1.
Score: 0.475
-
Nason KS. Minimal or maximal surgery for esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar; 151(3):633-635.
Score: 0.462
-
Zahoor H, Luketich JD, Weksler B, Winger DG, Christie NA, Levy RM, Gibson MK, Davison JM, Nason KS. The revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) improves prognostic stratification after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2015 Oct; 210(4):610-7.
Score: 0.453
-
Zahoor H, Luketich JD, Levy RM, Awais O, Winger DG, Gibson MK, Nason KS. A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb; 149(2):538-47.
Score: 0.432
-
Schaheen L, Blackmon SH, Nason KS. Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2014 Oct; 208(4):536-43.
Score: 0.425
-
Nason KS. Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb; 97(2):453.
Score: 0.412
-
Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul; 256(1):95-103.
Score: 0.369
-
Shah RD, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Landreneau RJ, Nason KS. Postesophagectomy chylothorax: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar; 93(3):897-903; discussion 903-4.
Score: 0.357
-
Pennathur A, Gooding WE, Nason KS, Luketich JD. Reply to Letter: "Poorer Survival for Stage IIa Patients After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy". Ann Surg. 2015 Aug; 262(2):e45-7.
Score: 0.114
-
Allum WH, Bonavina L, Cassivi SD, Cuesta MA, Dong ZM, Felix VN, Figueredo E, Gatenby PA, Haverkamp L, Ibraev MA, Krasna MJ, Lambert R, Langer R, Lewis MP, Nason KS, Parry K, Preston SR, Ruurda JP, Schaheen LW, Tatum RP, Turkin IN, van der Horst S, van der Peet DL, van der Sluis PC, van Hillegersberg R, Wormald JC, Wu PC, Zonderhuis BM. Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Sep; 1325:242-68.
Score: 0.107
-
Macke RA, Luketich JD, Nason KS, Schuchert MJ. Minimally invasive enucleation of a large, extensively calcified esophageal leiomyoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Apr; 147(4):e52-4.
Score: 0.103
-
Schuchert MJ, Abbas G, Nason KS, Pennathur A, Awais O, Santana M, Pereira R, Oostdyk A, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ. Impact of anastomotic leak on outcomes after transhiatal esophagectomy. Surgery. 2010 Oct; 148(4):831-8; discussion 838-40.
Score: 0.081
-
Qureshi I, Nason KS, Luketich JD. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008 Sep; 8(9):1449-60.
Score: 0.071
-
Lowenthal BM, Nason KS, Pennathur A, Luketich JD, Pai RK, Davison JM, Ma C. Loss of ARID1A expression is associated with DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency and favorable prognosis in advanced stage surgically resected esophageal adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2019 12; 94:1-10.
Score: 0.038