Header Logo

Connection

Mark Quirk to Family Practice

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Quirk has written about Family Practice.
Connection Strength

1.085
  1. Hatem D, Mazor K, Fischer M, Philbin M, Quirk M. Applying patient perspectives on caring to curriculum development. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Sep; 72(3):367-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  2. Quirk M, Lasser D, Domino F, Chuman A, Devaney-O'Neil S. Family medicine educators' perceptions of the future of faculty development. Fam Med. 2002 Nov-Dec; 34(10):755-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  3. Godkin M, Quirk M. Why students chose family medicine: state schools graduating the most family physicians. Fam Med. 1991 Sep-Oct; 23(7):521-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  4. Quirk M, Ockene J, Kristeller J, Goldberg R, Donnelly G, Amick T, Kalan K. Training family practice and internal medicine residents to counsel patients who smoke: improvement and retention of counseling skills. Fam Med. 1991 Feb; 23(2):108-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  5. Quirk M, Hall L. Surgeon and family physician opinions of the general surgical needs of family practice residents: a pilot study. Fam Pract Res J. 1988; 7(4):219-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  6. Sheets KJ, Quirk ME, Davis AK. The Family Medicine Curriculum Resource Project: implications for faculty development. Fam Med. 2007 Jan; 39(1):50-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  7. Mazor KM, Fischer MA, Haley HL, Hatem D, Rogers HJ, Quirk ME. Factors influencing preceptors' responses to medical errors: a factorial survey. Acad Med. 2005 Oct; 80(10 Suppl):S88-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  8. Simek-Downing L, Quirk M. Videotape analyses of medical students' interviewing skills. Fam Med. 1985 Mar-Apr; 17(2):57-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  9. Quirk M, Style A, Lasser D. Family practice and internal medicine residents' values related to future medical practices. J Med Educ. 1985 Feb; 60(2):138-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  10. Quirk M, Stone S, Chuman A, Devaney-O'Neil S, Mazor K, Starr S, Lasser D. Using differences between perceptions of importance and competence to identify teaching needs of primary care preceptors. Teach Learn Med. 2002; 14(3):157-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  11. Costanza ME, Luckmann R, Quirk ME, Clemow L, White MJ, Stoddard AM. The effectiveness of using standardized patients to improve community physician skills in mammography counseling and clinical breast exam. Prev Med. 1999 Oct; 29(4):241-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  12. Stone SL, Schwartz DG, Quirk M, Sarkin R, Qualters D. Faculty development for community-based physicians at the University of Massachusetts and SUNY-Buffalo. Acad Med. 1999 Jan; 74(1 Suppl):S75-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  13. Pugnaire MP, Leong SL, Quirk ME, Mazor K, Gray JM. The standardized family: an innovation in primary care education at the University of Massachusetts. Acad Med. 1999 Jan; 74(1 Suppl):S90-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  14. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Mygdal WK, DeWitt TG, Manfred LM, Quirk ME, Roberts KB, Greenberg LW. Clinical teaching improvement: past and future for faculty development. Fam Med. 1997 Apr; 29(4):252-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  15. Baldor RA, Quirk ME, Dohan D. Magnetic resonance imaging use by primary care physicians. J Fam Pract. 1993 Mar; 36(3):281-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  16. Simek-Downing L, Quirk ME, Letendre AJ. Simulated versus actual patients in teaching medical interviewing. Fam Med. 1986 Nov-Dec; 18(6):358-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  17. Ockene JK, Quirk ME, Goldberg RJ, Kristeller JL, Donnelly G, Kalan KL, Gould B, Greene HL, Harrison-Atlas R, Pease J, et al. A residents' training program for the development of smoking intervention skills. Arch Intern Med. 1988 May; 148(5):1039-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  18. Bibace R, Catlin RJ, Quirk ME, Beattie KA, Slabaugh RC. Teaching styles in the faculty-resident relationship. J Fam Pract. 1981 Nov; 13(6):895-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.