Header Logo

Connection

Arlene Ash to Models, Statistical

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arlene Ash has written about Models, Statistical.
Connection Strength

0.674
  1. Ash A, Shwartz M. R2: a useful measure of model performance when predicting a dichotomous outcome. Stat Med. 1999 Feb 28; 18(4):375-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  2. Zhang B, Liu W, Zhang N, Ash AS, Allison JJ. A collection of marginalized two-part random-effects models for analyzing medical expenditure panel data: Impact of the New Cooperative Medical Scheme on healthcare expenditures in China. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 08; 28(8):2494-2523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  3. Deng N, Allison JJ, Fang HJ, Ash AS, Ware JE. Using the bootstrap to establish statistical significance for relative validity comparisons among patient-reported outcome measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 May 31; 11:89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  4. Kronman AC, Freund KM, Hanchate A, Emanuel EJ, Ash AS. Nursing home residence confounds gender differences in Medicare utilization an example of Simpson's paradox. Womens Health Issues. 2010 Mar-Apr; 20(2):105-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  5. Yu W, Ellis RP, Ash A. Risk selection in the Massachusetts State employee health insurance program. Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Dec; 4(4):281-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  6. Berlowitz DR, Brandeis GH, Morris JN, Ash AS, Anderson JJ, Kader B, Moskowitz MA. Deriving a risk-adjustment model for pressure ulcer development using the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jul; 49(7):866-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  7. Berlowitz DR, Brandeis GH, Anderson JJ, Ash AS, Kader B, Morris JN, Moskowitz MA. Evaluation of a risk-adjustment model for pressure ulcer development using the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jul; 49(7):872-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  8. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Ash AS, Mackiernan Y, Hotchkin EK. Risk adjustment methods can affect perceptions of outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 1994; 9(2):43-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  9. Ash A, Schwartz M, Payne SM, Restuccia JD. The Self-Adapting Focused Review System. Probability sampling of medical records to monitor utilization and quality of care. Med Care. 1990 Nov; 28(11):1025-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  10. Pek?z EA, Shwartz M, Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Posner MA, Restuccia JD. Comparing the importance of disease rate versus practice style variations in explaining differences in small area hospitalization rates for two respiratory conditions. Stat Med. 2003 May 30; 22(10):1775-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  11. Mesler DE, McCarthy EP, Byrne-Logan S, Ash AS, Moskowitz MA. Does the survival advantage of nonwhite dialysis patients persist after case mix adjustment? Am J Med. 1999 Mar; 106(3):300-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  12. Shwartz M, Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Mackiernan YD. Do severity measures explain differences in length of hospital stay? The case of hip fracture. Health Serv Res. 1996 Oct; 31(4):365-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  13. Ghali WA, Hall RE, Rosen AK, Ash AS, Moskowitz MA. Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Mar; 49(3):273-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  14. Shwartz M, Klimberg RK, Karp M, Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Heineke J, Payne SM, Restuccia JD. An integer programming model to limit hospital selection in studies with repeated sampling. Health Serv Res. 1995 Jun; 30(2):359-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. Rosen AK, Ash AS, McNiff KJ, Moskowitz MA. The importance of severity of illness adjustment in predicting adverse outcomes in the Medicare population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May; 48(5):631-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  16. Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Coffman GA, Moskowitz MA. Predicting in-hospital mortality. A comparison of severity measurement approaches. Med Care. 1992 Apr; 30(4):347-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.