David Hatem to Teaching
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Hatem has written about Teaching.
Connection Strength
0.828
-
Hatem DS, Barrett SV, Hewson M, Steele D, Purwono U, Smith R. Teaching the medical interview: methods and key learning issues in a faculty development course. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec; 22(12):1718-24.
Score: 0.261
-
Hatem DS, Gallagher D, Frankel R. Challenges and opportunities for patients with HIV who educate health professionals. Teach Learn Med. 2003; 15(2):98-105.
Score: 0.187
-
Hatem D, Ferrara E. Becoming a doctor: fostering humane caregivers through creative writing. Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Oct; 45(1):13-22.
Score: 0.172
-
Mazor KM, Fischer MA, Haley HL, Hatem D, Quirk ME. Teaching and medical errors: primary care preceptors' views. Med Educ. 2005 Oct; 39(10):982-90.
Score: 0.057
-
Quirk M, Mazor K, Haley HL, Wellman S, Keller D, Hatem D, Keller LA. Reliability and validity of checklists and global ratings by standardized students, trained raters, and faculty raters in an objective structured teaching environment. Teach Learn Med. 2005; 17(3):202-9.
Score: 0.054
-
Stone S, Mazor K, Devaney-O'Neil S, Starr S, Ferguson W, Wellman S, Jacobson E, Hatem DS, Quirk M. Development and implementation of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) to evaluate improvement in feedback skills following a faculty development workshop. Teach Learn Med. 2003; 15(1):7-13.
Score: 0.047
-
Krupat E, Sprague JM, Wolpaw D, Haidet P, Hatem D, O'Brien B. Thinking critically about critical thinking: ability, disposition or both? Med Educ. 2011 Jun; 45(6):625-35.
Score: 0.021
-
Haidet P, Kelly PA, Bentley S, Blatt B, Chou CL, Fortin AH, Gordon G, Gracey C, Harrell H, Hatem DS, Helmer D, Paterniti DA, Wagner D, Inui TS. Not the same everywhere. Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May; 21(5):405-9.
Score: 0.015
-
Mazor KM, Fischer MA, Haley HL, Hatem D, Rogers HJ, Quirk ME. Factors influencing preceptors' responses to medical errors: a factorial survey. Acad Med. 2005 Oct; 80(10 Suppl):S88-92.
Score: 0.014