Header Logo

Connection

Debra Pinals to Expert Testimony

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Debra Pinals has written about Expert Testimony.
Connection Strength

1.094
  1. Kaempf AC, Baxter P, Packer IK, Pinals DA. Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Mar; 43(1):52-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.487
  2. Wall BW, Ash P, Keram E, Pinals DA, Thompson CR. AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Sep; 46(3 Supplement):S4-S79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  3. Glancy GD, Ash P, Bath EP, Buchanan A, Fedoroff P, Frierson RL, Harris VL, Hatters Friedman SJ, Hauser MJ, Knoll J, Norko M, Pinals D, Price M, Recupero P, Scott CL, Zonana HV. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Assessment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Jun; 43(2 Suppl):S3-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  4. Pinals DA. Veterans and the justice system: the next forensic frontier. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010; 38(2):163-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  5. LeBourgeois HW, Pinals DA, Williams V, Appelbaum PS. Hindsight bias among psychiatrists. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007; 35(1):67-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  6. Mossman D, Noffsinger SG, Ash P, Frierson RL, Gerbasi J, Hackett M, Lewis CF, Pinals DA, Scott CL, Sieg KG, Wall BW, Zonana HV. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  7. Sattar SP, Pinals DA, Gutheil TG. Countering countertransference, II: beyond evaluation to cross-examination. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004; 32(2):148-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  8. Sattar SP, Pinals DA, Gutheil T. Countering countertransference: a forensic trainee's dilemma. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002; 30(1):65-9; discussion 70-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.