Debra Pinals to Forensic Psychiatry
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Debra Pinals has written about Forensic Psychiatry.
Connection Strength
3.874
-
Callahan L, Pinals DA. Challenges to Reforming the Competence to Stand Trial and Competence Restoration System. Psychiatr Serv. 2020 07 01; 71(7):691-697.
Score: 0.657
-
Kaempf AC, Baxter P, Packer IK, Pinals DA. Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Mar; 43(1):52-9.
Score: 0.462
-
Pinals DA. Forensic services, public mental health policy, and financing: charting the course ahead. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014; 42(1):7-19.
Score: 0.426
-
Pinals DA, Frierson RL. The educational mission in forensic publishing. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014; 42(3):290-6.
Score: 0.426
-
Pinals DA. Ready or not, here it comes: maintenance of certification. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011; 39(3):294-6.
Score: 0.346
-
Pinals DA, Tillbrook CE, Mumley DL. Practical application of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA) in a public sector forensic setting. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006; 34(2):179-88.
Score: 0.245
-
Pinals DA. Forensic psychiatry fellowship training: developmental stages as an educational framework. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005; 33(3):317-23.
Score: 0.228
-
Pinals DA, Packer IK, Fisher W, Roy-Bujnowski K. Relationship between race and ethnicity and forensic clinical triage dispositions. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Aug; 55(8):873-8.
Score: 0.222
-
Wall BW, Ash P, Keram E, Pinals DA, Thompson CH. AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 09; 46(3):373.
Score: 0.147
-
Wall BW, Ash P, Keram E, Pinals DA, Thompson CR. AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Sep; 46(3 Supplement):S4-S79.
Score: 0.147
-
Friedman SH, Appel JM, Ash P, Frierson RL, Giorgi-Guarnieri D, Martinez R, Newman AW, Pinals DA, Resnick PJ, Simpson AI. Unsolicited E-mails to Forensic Psychiatrists. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2016 Dec; 44(4):470-478.
Score: 0.130
-
Glancy GD, Ash P, Bath EP, Buchanan A, Fedoroff P, Frierson RL, Harris VL, Hatters Friedman SJ, Hauser MJ, Knoll J, Norko M, Pinals D, Price M, Recupero P, Scott CL, Zonana HV. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Assessment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Jun; 43(2 Suppl):S3-53.
Score: 0.118
-
Christopher PP, Arikan R, Pinals DA, Fisher WH, Appelbaum PS. Evaluating psychiatric disability: differences by forensic expertise. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011; 39(2):183-8.
Score: 0.087
-
LeBourgeois HW, Pinals DA, Williams V, Appelbaum PS. Hindsight bias among psychiatrists. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007; 35(1):67-73.
Score: 0.066
-
Mossman D, Noffsinger SG, Ash P, Frierson RL, Gerbasi J, Hackett M, Lewis CF, Pinals DA, Scott CL, Sieg KG, Wall BW, Zonana HV. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72.
Score: 0.066
-
Sattar SP, Pinals DA, Gutheil TG. Countering countertransference, II: beyond evaluation to cross-examination. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004; 32(2):148-54.
Score: 0.053
-
Sattar SP, Pinals DA, Gutheil T. Countering countertransference: a forensic trainee's dilemma. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002; 30(1):65-9; discussion 70-3.
Score: 0.046