Header Logo

Connection

Kathleen Mazor to Professional-Family Relations

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kathleen Mazor has written about Professional-Family Relations.
Connection Strength

1.034
  1. Fisher KA, Ahmad S, Jackson M, Mazor KM. Surrogate decision makers' perspectives on preventable breakdowns in care among critically ill patients: A qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 10; 99(10):1685-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  2. Quinn T, Moskowitz J, Khan MW, Shutter L, Goldberg R, Col N, Mazor KM, Muehlschlegel S. What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients. Neurocrit Care. 2017 Oct; 27(2):154-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  3. Tjia J, Lemay CA, Bonner A, Compher C, Paice K, Field T, Mazor K, Hunnicutt JN, Lapane KL, Gurwitz J. Informed Family Member Involvement to Improve the Quality of Dementia Care in Nursing Homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 01; 65(1):59-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  4. Mazor KM, Beard RL, Alexander GL, Arora NK, Firneno C, Gaglio B, Greene SM, Lemay CA, Robinson BE, Roblin DW, Walsh K, Street RL, Gallagher TH. Patients' and family members' views on patient-centered communication during cancer care. Psychooncology. 2013 Nov; 22(11):2487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  5. Mazor KM, Gaglio B, Nekhlyudov L, Alexander GL, Stark A, Hornbrook MC, Walsh K, Boggs J, Lemay CA, Firneno C, Biggins C, Blosky MA, Arora NK. Assessing patient-centered communication in cancer care: stakeholder perspectives. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Sep; 9(5):e186-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  6. Stille CJ, Fischer SH, La Pelle N, Dworetzky B, Mazor KM, Cooley WC. Parent partnerships in communication and decision making about subspecialty referrals for children with special needs. Acad Pediatr. 2013 Mar-Apr; 13(2):122-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.