Diane Blake to Chlamydia trachomatis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Diane Blake has written about Chlamydia trachomatis.
Connection Strength
1.627
-
Huang W, Gaydos CA, Barnes MR, Jett-Goheen M, Blake DR. Comparative effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis among women in a clinical setting. Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Mar; 89(2):108-14.
Score: 0.389
-
Huang W, Gaydos CA, Barnes MR, Jett-Goheen M, Blake DR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening via internet-based self-collected swabs compared with clinic-based sample collection. Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Sep; 38(9):815-20.
Score: 0.362
-
Blake DR, Maldeis N, Barnes MR, Hardick A, Quinn TC, Gaydos CA. Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis using cervical swabs, urine, and self-obtained vaginal swabs in a sexually transmitted disease clinic setting. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jul; 35(7):649-55.
Score: 0.291
-
Blake DR, Quinn TC, Gaydos CA. Should asymptomatic men be included in chlamydia screening programs? Cost-effectiveness of chlamydia screening among male and female entrants to a national job training program. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jan; 35(1):91-101.
Score: 0.281
-
Sagor RS, Golding J, Giorgio MM, Blake DR. Power of Knowledge: Effect of Two Educational Interventions on Readiness for Chlamydia Screening. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Jul; 55(8):717-23.
Score: 0.120
-
Gift TL, Blake DR, Gaydos CA, Marrazzo JM. The cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S51-60.
Score: 0.074
-
Blake DR, Lemay CA, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC. Performance of urine leukocyte esterase in asymptomatic male youth: another look with nucleic acid amplification testing as the gold standard for Chlamydia detection. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Apr; 36(4):337-41.
Score: 0.058
-
Blake DR, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention. Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95.
Score: 0.053