David Hoaglin to Data Interpretation, Statistical
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Hoaglin has written about Data Interpretation, Statistical.
Connection Strength
1.681
-
Hoaglin DC. We know less than we should about methods of meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2015 Sep; 6(3):287-9.
Score: 0.450
-
Hoaglin DC. Letter to the Editor on Cohen et al. (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:299-306). J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan; 69:261-2.
Score: 0.450
-
Dong G, Huang B, Wang D, Verbeeck J, Wang J, Hoaglin DC. Adjusting win statistics for dependent censoring. Pharm Stat. 2021 05; 20(3):440-450.
Score: 0.164
-
Dong G, Mao L, Huang B, Gamalo-Siebers M, Wang J, Yu G, Hoaglin DC. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring. J Biopharm Stat. 2020 09 02; 30(5):882-899.
Score: 0.159
-
Dong G, Huang B, Chang YW, Seifu Y, Song J, Hoaglin DC. The win ratio: Impact of censoring and follow-up time and use with nonproportional hazards. Pharm Stat. 2020 05; 19(3):168-177.
Score: 0.153
-
Trikalinos TA, Hoaglin DC, Small KM, Terrin N, Schmid CH. Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests. Res Synth Methods. 2014 Dec; 5(4):294-312.
Score: 0.104
-
Dong G, Cui Y, Gamalo-Siebers M, Liao R, Liu D, Hoaglin DC, Lu Y. On approximate equality of Z-values of the statistical tests for win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit). J Biopharm Stat. 2025 May; 35(3):457-464.
Score: 0.054
-
Frankel MR, Srinath KP, Hoaglin DC, Battaglia MP, Smith PJ, Wright RA, Khare M. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys. Stat Med. 2003 May 15; 22(9):1611-26.
Score: 0.049
-
Song J, Verbeeck J, Huang B, Hoaglin DC, Gamalo-Siebers M, Seifu Y, Wang D, Cooner F, Dong G. The win odds: statistical inference and regression. J Biopharm Stat. 2023 03; 33(2):140-150.
Score: 0.046
-
Bakbergenuly I, Hoaglin DC, Kulinskaya E. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios. Res Synth Methods. 2020 May; 11(3):426-442.
Score: 0.039
-
Smith PJ, Hoaglin DC, Battaglia MP, Barker L. Implementation and applications of bootstrap methods for the National Immunization Survey. Stat Med. 2003 Aug 15; 22(15):2487-502.
Score: 0.012