David Hoaglin to Treatment Outcome
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Hoaglin has written about Treatment Outcome.
Connection Strength
0.597
-
Hoaglin DC. Assessment of heterogeneity in meta-analyses. JAMA. 2014 Dec 03; 312(21):2286-7.
Score: 0.222
-
Dong G, Mao L, Huang B, Gamalo-Siebers M, Wang J, Yu G, Hoaglin DC. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring. J Biopharm Stat. 2020 09 02; 30(5):882-899.
Score: 0.082
-
Dong G, Huang B, Chang YW, Seifu Y, Song J, Hoaglin DC. The win ratio: Impact of censoring and follow-up time and use with nonproportional hazards. Pharm Stat. 2020 05; 19(3):168-177.
Score: 0.078
-
Hoaglin DC. Meta-analysis of Opioids for Chronic Pain. JAMA. 2019 05 21; 321(19):1935-1936.
Score: 0.076
-
Hoaglin DC, Filonenko A, Glickman ME, Wasiak R, Gidwani R. Use of mixed-treatment-comparison methods in estimating efficacy of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding. Eur J Med Res. 2013 Jun 21; 18:17.
Score: 0.050
-
Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, Boersma C, Thompson D, Larholt KM, Diaz M, Barrett A. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health. 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37.
Score: 0.044
-
Dong G, Cui Y, Gamalo-Siebers M, Liao R, Liu D, Hoaglin DC, Lu Y. On approximate equality of Z-values of the statistical tests for win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit). J Biopharm Stat. 2025 May; 35(3):457-464.
Score: 0.027
-
Kam-Hansen S, Jakubowski M, Kelley JM, Kirsch I, Hoaglin DC, Kaptchuk TJ, Burstein R. Altered placebo and drug labeling changes the outcome of episodic migraine attacks. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jan 08; 6(218):218ra5.
Score: 0.013
-
Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Antczak-Bouckoms A, Mosteller F, Colditz GA. Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects. Stat Med. 1998 Nov 30; 17(22):2537-50.
Score: 0.005