Charles Lidz to Research Subjects
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about Research Subjects.
Connection Strength
2.855
-
Christopher PP, Garcia-Sampson LG, Stein M, Johnson J, Rich J, Lidz C. Enrolling in Clinical Research While Incarcerated: What Influences Participants' Decisions? Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Mar; 47(2):21-29.
Score: 0.528
-
Lidz CW, Albert K, Appelbaum P, Dunn LB, Overton E, Pivovarova E. Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Apr; 24(2):231-41.
Score: 0.462
-
Lidz C, Appelbaum PS. Context is everything: psychological data and consent to research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb; 44(1):35-6.
Score: 0.424
-
Lidz CW, Garverich S. What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform. J Law Med Ethics. 2013; 41(2):390-6.
Score: 0.396
-
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. Re-evaluating the therapeutic misconception: response to Miller and Joffe. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec; 16(4):367-73.
Score: 0.259
-
Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May; 58(9):1689-97.
Score: 0.217
-
Parker LS, Lidz CW. Familial coercion to participate in genetic family studies: is there cause for IRB intervention? IRB. 1994 Jan-Apr; 16(1-2):6-12.
Score: 0.106
-
Monahan J, Appelbaum PS, Mulvey EP, Robbins PC, Lidz CW. Ethical and legal duties in conducting research on violence: lessons from the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study. Violence Vict. 1993; 8(4):387-96.
Score: 0.099
-
Lidz CW. Therapeutic misconception and the limits of ethnography. A commentary on Timmermans and McKay. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec; 69(12):1791-2.
Score: 0.079
-
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr; 38(2):5-6; author reply 6-7.
Score: 0.071
-
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. Clinical ethics versus clinical research. Am J Bioeth. 2006 Jul-Aug; 6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5.
Score: 0.063
-
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Correction and clarification. IRB. 2004 Sep-Oct; 26(5):18.
Score: 0.056
-
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB. 2004 Mar-Apr; 26(2):1-8.
Score: 0.054
-
Geller JL, Lidz CW, Pattulo EL. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent? IRB. 1987 Sep-Oct; 9(5):4-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Apr; 17(2):20-4.
Score: 0.017
-
Benson PR, Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Winslade WJ. Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research. Law Hum Behav. 1988 Dec; 12(4):455-75.
Score: 0.005
-
Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade WJ. Informed consent in psychiatric research. Rutgers Law Rev. 1987 Winter-Spring; 39(2-3):425-41.
Score: 0.004