Charles Lidz to Ethics Committees, Research
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Lidz has written about Ethics Committees, Research.
Connection Strength
4.885
-
Murray A, Pivovarova E, Klitzman R, Stiles DF, Appelbaum P, Lidz CW. Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar; 12(1):33-40.
Score: 0.677
-
Klitzman R, Appelbaum PS, Murray A, Pivovarova E, Stiles DF, Lidz CW. When IRBs Say No to Participating in Research about Single IRBs. Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Jan; 42(1):36-40.
Score: 0.643
-
Pivovarova E, Klitzman RL, Murray A, Stiles DF, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW. How Single Institutional Review Boards Manage Their Own Conflicts of Interest: Findings From a National Interview Study. Acad Med. 2019 10; 94(10):1554-1560.
Score: 0.632
-
Klitzman R, Pivovarova E, Murray A, Appelbaum PS, Stiles DF, Lidz CW. Local Knowledge and Single IRBs for Multisite Studies: Challenges and Solutions. Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Jan; 41(1):22-31.
Score: 0.600
-
Lidz CW, Pivovarova E, Appelbaum P, Stiles DF, Murray A, Klitzman RL. Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep; 9(3):164-172.
Score: 0.590
-
Klitzman R, Pivovarova E, Lidz CW. Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy. JAMA. 2017 05 23; 317(20):2061-2062.
Score: 0.537
-
Lidz CW, Garverich S. What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform. J Law Med Ethics. 2013; 41(2):390-6.
Score: 0.396
-
Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Arnold R, Candilis P, Gardner W, Myers S, Simon L. How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule? Acad Med. 2012 Jul; 87(7):969-74.
Score: 0.382
-
Parker LS, Lidz CW. Familial coercion to participate in genetic family studies: is there cause for IRB intervention? IRB. 1994 Jan-Apr; 16(1-2):6-12.
Score: 0.106
-
Candilis PJ, Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Arnold RM, Gardner W, Myers S, Grudzinskas AJ, Simon LJ. The silent majority: who speaks at IRB meetings? IRB. 2012 Jul-Aug; 34(4):15-20.
Score: 0.096
-
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R. Voluntariness of consent to research: a preliminary empirical investigation. IRB. 2009 Nov-Dec; 31(6):10-4.
Score: 0.079
-
Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, Albert K, Rosenbaum J, Simon L. Competing commitments in clinical trials. IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct; 31(5):1-6.
Score: 0.079
-
Candilis PJ, Lidz CW, Arnold RM. The need to understand IRB deliberations. IRB. 2006 Jan-Feb; 28(1):1-5.
Score: 0.061
-
Geller JL, Lidz CW, Pattulo EL. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent? IRB. 1987 Sep-Oct; 9(5):4-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade WJ. Informed consent in psychiatric research. Rutgers Law Rev. 1987 Winter-Spring; 39(2-3):425-41.
Score: 0.004