Richard Van Emmerik to Psychomotor Performance
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Van Emmerik has written about Psychomotor Performance.
Connection Strength
4.400
-
Jeong H, Carey S, Van Emmerik R. Effects of Task Difficulty on Postural Control During a Combined Gait Termination and Manual Task. Motor Control. 2025 Apr 01; 29(2):183-201.
Score: 0.875
-
Zeff SR, Martini DN, Hamill J, van Emmerik R. Head Control and Upper-Body Coordination during Gait in Collegiate Contact and Noncontact Athletes. J Mot Behav. 2025; 57(3):287-298.
Score: 0.875
-
Depr? PP, Amado A, van Emmerik REA. Postural Control Underlying Head Movements While Tracking Visual Targets. Motor Control. 2019 Jul 01; 23(3):365-383.
Score: 0.572
-
Amado AC, Palmer CJ, Hamill J, van Emmerik RE. Coupling of postural and manual tasks in expert performers. Hum Mov Sci. 2016 Apr; 46:251-60.
Score: 0.471
-
Haddad JM, Claxton LJ, Keen R, Berthier NE, Riccio GE, Hamill J, Van Emmerik RE. Development of the coordination between posture and manual control. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Feb; 111(2):286-98.
Score: 0.345
-
Hasson CJ, Caldwell GE, van Emmerik RE. Changes in muscle and joint coordination in learning to direct forces. Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Aug; 27(4):590-609.
Score: 0.271
-
de Medeiros DL, Rossi DM, de Lemos TW, van Emmerik R, Mochizuki L, de Oliveira AS. Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks at Different Execution Speeds in Children with Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. J Mot Behav. 2025; 57(2):107-117.
Score: 0.214
-
Rinaldi NM, Lim J, Hamill J, Moraes R, van Emmerik R. Visual cues two-steps ahead are adequate to grasp an object while walking without compromising stability. Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Aug; 78:102820.
Score: 0.168
-
Rinaldi NM, Lim J, Hamill J, Van Emmerik R, Moraes R. Walking combined with reach-to-grasp while crossing obstacles at different distances. Gait Posture. 2018 09; 65:1-7.
Score: 0.137
-
Stock H, van Emmerik R, Wilson C, Preatoni E. Applying circular statistics can cause artefacts in the calculation of vector coding variability: A bivariate solution. Gait Posture. 2018 09; 65:51-56.
Score: 0.137
-
Haddad JM, Van Emmerik RE, Wheat JS, Hamill J. Developmental changes in the dynamical structure of postural sway during a precision fitting task. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Oct; 190(4):431-41.
Score: 0.069
-
Seay JF, Haddad JM, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. Coordination variability around the walk to run transition during human locomotion. Motor Control. 2006 Apr; 10(2):178-96.
Score: 0.059
-
Pollard CD, Heiderscheit BC, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. Gender differences in lower extremity coupling variability during an unanticipated cutting maneuver. J Appl Biomech. 2005 May; 21(2):143-52.
Score: 0.055
-
Peters BT, Haddad JM, Heiderscheit BC, Van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. Limitations in the use and interpretation of continuous relative phase. J Biomech. 2003 Feb; 36(2):271-4.
Score: 0.047
-
van Emmerik RE, van Wegen EE. On the functional aspects of variability in postural control. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002 Oct; 30(4):177-83.
Score: 0.046
-
Celestino ML, van Emmerik R, Barela JA, Gama GL, Barela AMF. Intralimb gait coordination of individuals with stroke using vector coding. Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Dec; 68:102522.
Score: 0.038
-
MacLean CL, van Emmerik R, Hamill J. Influence of custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity intralimb coupling during a 30-minute run. J Appl Biomech. 2010 Nov; 26(4):390-9.
Score: 0.020