Charles Clifton to Language
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Clifton has written about Language.
Connection Strength
3.955
-
Clifton C, Frazier L, Kaup B. Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents. J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec; 50(6):1261-1282.
Score: 0.663
-
Frazier L, Clifton C. Interpreting Adjuncts: Processing English As-Clauses. Lang Speech. 2022 Mar; 65(1):193-215.
Score: 0.646
-
Clifton C, Xiang M, Frazier L. A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis. J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Aug; 48(4):877-887.
Score: 0.577
-
Clifton C, Frazier L. Evaluation of the epistemic state of the speaker/author. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun; 71(6):1482-1492.
Score: 0.517
-
Staub A, Dillon B, Clifton C. The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative Sentences. Cogn Sci. 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6:1353-1376.
Score: 0.477
-
Rayner K, Clifton C. Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research. Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan; 80(1):4-9.
Score: 0.265
-
Carlson K, Dickey MW, Frazier L, Clifton C. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan; 62(1):114-39.
Score: 0.264
-
Frazier L, Carlson K, Clifton C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun; 10(6):244-9.
Score: 0.230
-
Clifton C, Rysling A, Bishop J. The prosodic accent advantage in phoneme detection: Importance of local context. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan; 84(1):244-259.
Score: 0.168
-
Clifton C, Frazier L. Should given information come before new? Yes and no. Mem Cognit. 2004 Sep; 32(6):886-95.
Score: 0.051
-
Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Informative prosodic boundaries. Lang Speech. 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):87-114.
Score: 0.044
-
Clifton C, Duffy SA. Sentence and text comprehension: roles of linguistic structure. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:167-96.
Score: 0.040
-
Frazier L, Clifton C, Rayner K, Deevy P, Koh S, Bader M. Interface problems: structural constraints on interpretation? J Psycholinguist Res. 2005 May; 34(3):201-31.
Score: 0.013