Charles Clifton to Comprehension
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Clifton has written about Comprehension.
Connection Strength
3.006
-
Clifton C, Frazier L. Evaluation of the epistemic state of the speaker/author. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun; 71(6):1482-1492.
Score: 0.529
-
Staub A, Dillon B, Clifton C. The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative Sentences. Cogn Sci. 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6:1353-1376.
Score: 0.488
-
Clifton C, Frazier L. Discourse integration guided by the 'question under discussion'. Cogn Psychol. 2012 Sep; 65(2):352-79.
Score: 0.360
-
Clifton C, Frazier L. Interpreting conjoined noun phrases and conjoined clauses: collective versus distributive preferences. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012; 65(9):1760-76.
Score: 0.356
-
Carlson K, Dickey MW, Frazier L, Clifton C. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan; 62(1):114-39.
Score: 0.270
-
Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct; 13(5):854-61.
Score: 0.242
-
Frazier L, Carlson K, Clifton C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun; 10(6):244-9.
Score: 0.236
-
Staub A, Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36.
Score: 0.233
-
Clifton C, Xiang M, Frazier L. A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis. J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Aug; 48(4):877-887.
Score: 0.148
-
Frazier L, Clifton C, Stolterfoht B. Scale structure: processing minimum standard and maximum standard scalar adjectives. Cognition. 2008 Jan; 106(1):299-324.
Score: 0.063
-
Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Informative prosodic boundaries. Lang Speech. 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):87-114.
Score: 0.045
-
Carlson K, Clifton C, Frazier L. Nonlocal effects of prosodic boundaries. Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct; 37(7):1014-25.
Score: 0.019
-
Staub A, Grant M, Clifton C, Rayner K. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May; 35(3):806-14.
Score: 0.018