Header Logo

Connection

Charles Clifton to Speech Perception

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Clifton has written about Speech Perception.
Connection Strength

2.233
  1. Clifton C, Rysling A, Bishop J. The prosodic accent advantage in phoneme detection: Importance of local context. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan; 84(1):244-259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.669
  2. Rayner K, Clifton C. Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research. Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan; 80(1):4-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  3. Carlson K, Dickey MW, Frazier L, Clifton C. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan; 62(1):114-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.263
  4. Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct; 13(5):854-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  5. Frazier L, Carlson K, Clifton C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun; 10(6):244-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  6. Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Informative prosodic boundaries. Lang Speech. 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):87-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  7. Rysling A, Bishop J, Clifton C, Yacovone A. Preceding syllables are necessary for the accent advantage effect. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 09; 148(3):EL285.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  8. Birch S, Clifton C. Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension. Lang Speech. 1995 Oct-Dec; 38 ( Pt 4):365-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  9. Carlson K, Clifton C, Frazier L. Nonlocal effects of prosodic boundaries. Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct; 37(7):1014-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  10. Staub A, Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.