Header Logo

Connection

Adrian Staub to Attention

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Adrian Staub has written about Attention.
Connection Strength

1.691
  1. Kretzschmar F, Schlesewsky M, Staub A. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  2. Staub A. Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architecture. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug; 140(3):407-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.338
  3. Staub A. The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May; 33(3):550-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  4. Staub A, McMurray H, Wickett A. Perceptual inference corrects function word errors in reading: Errors that are not noticed do not disrupt eye movements. Cogn Psychol. 2024 Nov; 154:101691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  5. Cohen AL, Staub A. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cogn Psychol. 2015 Sep; 81:26-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  6. Helfer KS, Staub A. Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence. Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr; 35(2):161-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  7. Staub A, Grant M, Clifton C, Rayner K. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May; 35(3):806-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  8. Drieghe D, Pollatsek A, Staub A, Rayner K. The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1552-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  9. Potter MC, Staub A, O'Connor DH, Potter MC. Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Jun; 30(3):478-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  10. Potter MC, Staub A, O'Connor DH. The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct; 28(5):1149-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.