Header Logo

Connection

Adrian Staub to Comprehension

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Adrian Staub has written about Comprehension.
Connection Strength

4.684
  1. Staub A, Chen A, Peck E, Taylor N. Estimating the rate of failure to notice function?word errors in natural reading. Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr; 32(2):847-854.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.851
  2. Ristic B, Mancini S, Molinaro N, Staub A. Maintenance cost in the processing of subject-verb dependencies. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun; 48(6):829-838.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.660
  3. Staub A, Dodge S, Cohen AL. Failure to detect function word repetitions and omissions in reading: Are eye movements to blame? Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb; 26(1):340-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.575
  4. Staub A, Dillon B, Clifton C. The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative Sentences. Cogn Sci. 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6:1353-1376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.492
  5. Kretzschmar F, Schlesewsky M, Staub A. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.445
  6. Cohen AL, Staub A. Online processing of novel noun-noun compounds: eye movement evidence. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014; 67(1):147-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  7. Staub A, Rayner K, Pollatsek A, Hy?n? J, Majewski H. The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: evidence from noun-noun compounds. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov; 33(6):1162-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.263
  8. Staub A. The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May; 33(3):550-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  9. Staub A, Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  10. Staub A, McMurray H, Wickett A. Perceptual inference corrects function word errors in reading: Errors that are not noticed do not disrupt eye movements. Cogn Psychol. 2024 Nov; 154:101691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  11. White SJ, Staub A. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  12. Staub A, White SJ, Drieghe D, Hollway EC, Rayner K. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct; 36(5):1280-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  13. Staub A, Grant M, Clifton C, Rayner K. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May; 35(3):806-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  14. Drieghe D, Pollatsek A, Staub A, Rayner K. The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1552-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.