Adrian Staub to Reaction Time
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Adrian Staub has written about Reaction Time.
Connection Strength
1.475
-
Staub A, Grant M, Clifton C, Rayner K. Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep; 37(5):1326-8.
Score: 0.367
-
Staub A. Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction. Cognition. 2010 Mar; 114(3):447-54.
Score: 0.326
-
Staub A, Grant M, Clifton C, Rayner K. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May; 35(3):806-14.
Score: 0.312
-
Hammerly C, Staub A, Dillon B. The grammaticality asymmetry in agreement attraction reflects response bias: Experimental and modeling evidence. Cogn Psychol. 2019 05; 110:70-104.
Score: 0.154
-
Helfer KS, Staub A. Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence. Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr; 35(2):161-70.
Score: 0.109
-
Staub A, White SJ, Drieghe D, Hollway EC, Rayner K. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct; 36(5):1280-93.
Score: 0.086
-
Staub A, Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36.
Score: 0.063
-
Johnson RL, Staub A, Fleri AM. Distributional analysis of the transposed-letter neighborhood effect on naming latency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov; 38(6):1773-9.
Score: 0.024
-
Drieghe D, Pollatsek A, Staub A, Rayner K. The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1552-60.
Score: 0.019
-
Potter MC, Staub A, O'Connor DH, Potter MC. Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Jun; 30(3):478-89.
Score: 0.014