Andrew Karellas to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Karellas has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.363
-
Vedantham S, Tseng HW, Konate S, Shi L, Karellas A. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020; 28(3):405-426.
Score: 0.025
-
Karellas A. Challenges in Dosimetry and Radiation Dose Trends. Radiology. 2020 Feb; 294(2):360-361.
Score: 0.025
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):114-121.
Score: 0.021
-
Shrestha S, Vedantham S, Karellas A. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling. Phys Med Biol. 2017 03 07; 62(5):1969-1993.
Score: 0.021
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A. Large-angle x-ray scatter in Talbot-Lau interferometry for breast imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 07; 59(21):6387-400.
Score: 0.018
-
St Peter B, Yngvesson S, Siqueira P, Kelly P, Khan A, Glick S, Karellas A. Development and testing of a single frequency terahertz imaging system for breast cancer detection. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013 Jul; 17(4):785-97.
Score: 0.016
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. X-ray phase contrast imaging of the breast: analysis of tissue simulating materials. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041906.
Score: 0.016
-
Noo F, Karellas A. Focus series introduction. X-ray computed tomography: 2012 advances in image formation. Med Phys. 2013 Mar; 40(3):031001.
Score: 0.016
-
Karellas A. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5.
Score: 0.015
-
Karellas A, Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Med Phys. 2008 Nov; 35(11):4878-97.
Score: 0.012
-
Sechopoulos I, Vedantham S, Suryanarayanan S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):98-105.
Score: 0.011
-
Karellas A, Lo JY, Orton CG. Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):409-11.
Score: 0.011
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):434-43.
Score: 0.011
-
Karellas A. Mammographic pattern analysis: an emerging risk assessment tool. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):511-2.
Score: 0.010
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76.
Score: 0.010
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32.
Score: 0.010
-
Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients. Med Phys. 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417.
Score: 0.008
-
Kleinman PK, O'Connor B, Nimkin K, Rayder SM, Spevak MR, Belanger PL, Getty DJ, Karellas A. Detection of rib fractures in an abused infant using digital radiography: a laboratory study. Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Dec; 32(12):896-901.
Score: 0.008
-
Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector. Med Phys. 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088.
Score: 0.007
-
Fu Z, Tseng HW, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Bilgin A. A residual dense network assisted sparse view reconstruction for breast computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2020 12 03; 10(1):21111.
Score: 0.007
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. The role of off-focus radiation in scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT. Med Phys. 2018 Jan; 45(1):191-201.
Score: 0.005
-
O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Kawakyu-O'Connor DT. Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):106-113.
Score: 0.005
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. X-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT using a forward-projection model. Med Phys. 2017 Jun; 44(6):2312-2320.
Score: 0.005
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. Library based x-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT. Med Phys. 2016 Aug; 43(8):4529.
Score: 0.005
-
Vedantham S, Shrestha S, Karellas A, Shi L, Gounis MJ, Bellazzini R, Spandre G, Brez A, Minuti M. Photon-counting hexagonal pixel array CdTe detector: Spatial resolution characteristics for image-guided interventional applications. Med Phys. 2016 May; 43(5):2118.
Score: 0.005
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. Radiology. 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84.
Score: 0.005
-
Goertz L, Tsiamas P, Karellas A, Sajo E, Zygmanski P. Monte Carlo simulation of a prototypical patient dosimetry system for fluoroscopic procedures. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Aug 07; 60(15):5891-909.
Score: 0.005
-
O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S. The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples. Breast J. 2014 Nov-Dec; 20(6):592-605.
Score: 0.004
-
Jon AF, Cheema AR, Khan AN, Raptopoulos V, Hauser T, Nasser I, Welty FK, Karellas A, Clouse ME. Assessment of liver fat in an obese patient population using noncontrast CT fat percent index. Clin Imaging. 2014 May-Jun; 38(3):259-64.
Score: 0.004
-
Marya N, Karellas A, Foley A, Roychowdhury A, Cave D. Computerized 3-dimensional localization of a video capsule in the abdominal cavity: validation by digital radiography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr; 79(4):669-74.
Score: 0.004
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM, Conover DL. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 21; 58(22):7921-36.
Score: 0.004
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Emmons MM, Moss LJ, Hussain S, Baker SP. Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 21; 58(12):4099-118.
Score: 0.004
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT. Med Phys. 2013 Mar; 40(3):031913.
Score: 0.004
-
Kanal KM, Krupinski E, Berns EA, Geiser WR, Karellas A, Mainiero MB, Martin MC, Patel SB, Rubin DL, Shepard JD, Siegel EL, Wolfman JA, Mian TA, Mahoney MC. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb; 26(1):10-25.
Score: 0.004
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28.
Score: 0.004
-
D'Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, Sechopoulos I, Newell MS, Gundry KR, Bates SR, Nishikawa RM, Sickles EA, Karellas A, D'Orsi EM. Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jan; 266(1):81-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, Michaelsen KE, Krishnaswamy V, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD. Semi-automated segmentation and classification of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstructed images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:6188-91.
Score: 0.003
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):130-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. Radiology. 2005 Jul; 236(1):31-6.
Score: 0.002
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Onishi SK. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype. Med Phys. 2004 Jun; 31(6):1462-72.
Score: 0.002
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Ved H, Baker SP, D'Orsi CJ. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7.
Score: 0.002
-
Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7.
Score: 0.002