Andrew Karellas to Radiographic Image Enhancement
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Karellas has written about Radiographic Image Enhancement.
Connection Strength
2.662
-
Karellas A. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5.
Score: 0.392
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar; 29(3):790-806.
Score: 0.331
-
Karellas A, Lo JY, Orton CG. Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):409-11.
Score: 0.287
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76.
Score: 0.268
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32.
Score: 0.266
-
Kleinman PK, O'Connor B, Nimkin K, Rayder SM, Spevak MR, Belanger PL, Getty DJ, Karellas A. Detection of rib fractures in an abused infant using digital radiography: a laboratory study. Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Dec; 32(12):896-901.
Score: 0.196
-
Shrestha S, Vedantham S, Karellas A. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling. Phys Med Biol. 2017 03 07; 62(5):1969-1993.
Score: 0.133
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. Radiology. 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84.
Score: 0.123
-
Marya N, Karellas A, Foley A, Roychowdhury A, Cave D. Computerized 3-dimensional localization of a video capsule in the abdominal cavity: validation by digital radiography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr; 79(4):669-74.
Score: 0.108
-
Kanal KM, Krupinski E, Berns EA, Geiser WR, Karellas A, Mainiero MB, Martin MC, Patel SB, Rubin DL, Shepard JD, Siegel EL, Wolfman JA, Mian TA, Mahoney MC. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb; 26(1):10-25.
Score: 0.101
-
D'Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, Sechopoulos I, Newell MS, Gundry KR, Bates SR, Nishikawa RM, Sickles EA, Karellas A, D'Orsi EM. Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jan; 266(1):81-8.
Score: 0.100
-
Karellas A, Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Med Phys. 2008 Nov; 35(11):4878-97.
Score: 0.076
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I. Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 21; 51(12):3041-55.
Score: 0.064
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Onishi SK. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 07; 50(17):3957-69.
Score: 0.060
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: parallel-cascaded linear systems analysis. Med Phys. 2004 May; 31(5):1258-68.
Score: 0.055
-
Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7.
Score: 0.049
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28.
Score: 0.025
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Onishi SK. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype. Med Phys. 2004 Jun; 31(6):1462-72.
Score: 0.014
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Ved H, Baker SP, D'Orsi CJ. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7.
Score: 0.013