Header Logo

Connection

Andrew Karellas to Phantoms, Imaging

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Karellas has written about Phantoms, Imaging.
Connection Strength

1.151
  1. Vedantham S, Karellas A. X-ray phase contrast imaging of the breast: analysis of tissue simulating materials. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041906.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  2. Sechopoulos I, Vedantham S, Suryanarayanan S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):98-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  3. Tseng HW, Vedantham S, Cho SH, Karellas A. Joint Optimization of Collimator and Reconstruction Parameters in X-Ray Fluorescence Computed Tomography Using Analytical Point Spread Function and Model Observer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 09; 67(9):2443-2452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  4. Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients. Med Phys. 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  5. Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Cone-beam breast CT using an offset detector: effect of detector offset and image reconstruction algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2022 04 07; 67(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  6. Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector. Med Phys. 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  7. Deng L, Yasar S, Ahmed MF, Jayarathna S, Feng P, Wei B, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Cho SH. Investigation of transmission computed tomography (CT) image quality and x-ray dose achievable from an experimental dual-mode benchtop x-ray fluorescence CT and transmission CT system. J Xray Sci Technol. 2019; 27(3):431-442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  8. Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. X-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT using a forward-projection model. Med Phys. 2017 Jun; 44(6):2312-2320.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  9. Vedantham S, Shrestha S, Karellas A, Shi L, Gounis MJ, Bellazzini R, Spandre G, Brez A, Minuti M. Photon-counting hexagonal pixel array CdTe detector: Spatial resolution characteristics for image-guided interventional applications. Med Phys. 2016 May; 43(5):2118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  10. Goertz L, Tsiamas P, Karellas A, Sajo E, Zygmanski P. Monte Carlo simulation of a prototypical patient dosimetry system for fluoroscopic procedures. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Aug 07; 60(15):5891-909.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Jones BL, Manohar N, Reynoso F, Karellas A, Cho SH. Experimental demonstration of benchtop x-ray fluorescence computed tomography (XFCT) of gold nanoparticle-loaded objects using lead- and tin-filtered polychromatic cone-beams. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Dec 07; 57(23):N457-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  12. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):130-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  13. Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Onishi SK. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype. Med Phys. 2004 Jun; 31(6):1462-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging. 2004 Mar; 17(1):64-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  15. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Ved H, Baker SP, D'Orsi CJ. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.