Header Logo

Connection

Andrew Karellas to Mammography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Karellas has written about Mammography.
Andrew Karellas
Connection Strength
5.967
Mammography
  1. Vedantham S, Tseng HW, Konate S, Shi L, Karellas A. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020; 28(3):405-426.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  2. Vedantham S, Karellas A. Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):114-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  3. Shrestha S, Vedantham S, Karellas A. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling. Phys Med Biol. 2017 03 07; 62(5):1969-1993.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.459
  4. Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A. Large-angle x-ray scatter in Talbot-Lau interferometry for breast imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 07; 59(21):6387-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.392
  5. Vedantham S, Shi L, Glick SJ, Karellas A. Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT. Med Phys. 2013 Jan; 40(1):011901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.347
  6. Karellas A. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.337
  7. Karellas A, Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Med Phys. 2008 Nov; 35(11):4878-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  8. Sechopoulos I, Vedantham S, Suryanarayanan S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):98-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  9. Karellas A, Lo JY, Orton CG. Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):409-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  10. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):434-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  11. Karellas A. Mammographic pattern analysis: an emerging risk assessment tool. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):511-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  12. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  13. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  14. Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients. Med Phys. 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  15. Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector. Med Phys. 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  16. O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Kawakyu-O'Connor DT. Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):106-113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  17. Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. Library based x-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT. Med Phys. 2016 Aug; 43(8):4529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  18. Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. Radiology. 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  19. Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM, Conover DL. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 21; 58(22):7921-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  20. Vedantham S, Karellas A, Emmons MM, Moss LJ, Hussain S, Baker SP. Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 21; 58(12):4099-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  21. Kanal KM, Krupinski E, Berns EA, Geiser WR, Karellas A, Mainiero MB, Martin MC, Patel SB, Rubin DL, Shepard JD, Siegel EL, Wolfman JA, Mian TA, Mahoney MC. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb; 26(1):10-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  22. Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  23. D'Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, Sechopoulos I, Newell MS, Gundry KR, Bates SR, Nishikawa RM, Sickles EA, Karellas A, D'Orsi EM. Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jan; 266(1):81-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  24. Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, Noo F. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory. Med Phys. 2012 Mar; 39(3):1530-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  25. Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, Michaelsen KE, Krishnaswamy V, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD. Semi-automated segmentation and classification of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstructed images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:6188-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  26. Vedantham S, Karellas A. Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar; 29(3):790-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  27. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):130-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  28. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I. Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 21; 51(12):3041-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  29. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Onishi SK. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 07; 50(17):3957-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  30. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. Radiology. 2005 Jul; 236(1):31-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  31. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging. 2004 Mar; 17(1):64-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  32. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Ved H, Baker SP, D'Orsi CJ. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  33. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  34. Karathanasis E, Suryanarayanan S, Balusu SR, McNeeley K, Sechopoulos I, Karellas A, Annapragada AV, Bellamkonda RV. Imaging nanoprobe for prediction of outcome of nanoparticle chemotherapy by using mammography. Radiology. 2009 Feb; 250(2):398-406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.