Srinivasan Vedantham to Sensitivity and Specificity
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Srinivasan Vedantham has written about Sensitivity and Specificity.
Connection Strength
0.596
-
Vijayargahavan GR, Watkins J, Tyminski M, Venkataraman S, Amornsiripanitch N, Newburg A, Ghosh E, Vedantham S. Audit of Prior Screening Mammograms of Screen-Detected Cancers: Implications for the Delay in Breast Cancer Detection. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2023 Feb; 44(1):62-69.
Score: 0.162
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. X-ray phase contrast imaging of the breast: analysis of tissue simulating materials. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041906.
Score: 0.082
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28.
Score: 0.081
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Onishi SK. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype. Med Phys. 2004 Jun; 31(6):1462-72.
Score: 0.045
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Albagli D, Han S, Tkaczyk EJ, Landberg CE, Opsahl-Ong B, Granfors PR, Levis I, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys. 2000 Mar; 27(3):558-67.
Score: 0.033
-
Mushtaq R, Desoky SM, Morello F, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Gopalakrishnan G, Leetch A, Vedantham S, Kalb B, Martin DR, Udayasankar UK. First-Line Diagnostic Evaluation with MRI of Children Suspected of Having Acute Appendicitis. Radiology. 2019 04; 291(1):170-177.
Score: 0.031
-
Arif-Tiwari H, Twiss CO, Lin FC, Funk JT, Vedantham S, Martin DR, Kalb BT. Improved Detection of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparative Utility of Defecography Phase Sequence to Nondefecography Valsalva Maneuvers in Dynamic Pelvic Floor Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Jul - Aug; 48(4):342-347.
Score: 0.030
-
O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Kawakyu-O'Connor DT. Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):106-113.
Score: 0.028
-
Vijayaraghavan GR, Vedantham S, Kataoka M, DeBenedectis C, Quinlan RM. The Relevance of Ultrasound Imaging of Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes and Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Post-ACOSOG Z11 Era in Early Breast Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2017 03; 24(3):308-315.
Score: 0.027
-
Dundamadappa SK, Thangasamy S, Resteghini N, Vedantham S, Chen A, Takhtani D. Skull fractures in pediatric patients on computerized tomogram: comparison between routing bone window images and 3D volume-rendered images. Emerg Radiol. 2015 Aug; 22(4):367-72.
Score: 0.023
-
van der Bom IM, Hou SY, Puri AS, Spilberg G, Ruijters D, van de Haar P, Carelsen B, Vedantham S, Gounis MJ, Wakhloo AK. Reduction of coil mass artifacts in high-resolution flat detector conebeam CT of cerebral stent-assisted coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Nov-Dec; 34(11):2163-70.
Score: 0.021
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I. Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 21; 51(12):3041-55.
Score: 0.013
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Onishi SK. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 07; 50(17):3957-69.
Score: 0.012
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Baker SP, Glick SJ, D'Orsi CJ, Webber RL. Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2001 Mar; 8(3):219-24.
Score: 0.009