Srinivasan Vedantham to Algorithms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Srinivasan Vedantham has written about Algorithms.
Connection Strength
2.303
-
Tseng HW, Fu Z, Vedantham S. Simultaneous reduction of radiation dose and scatter-to-primary ratio using a truncated detector and advanced algorithms for dedicated cone-beam breast CT. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025 Mar 03; 11(2).
Score: 0.642
-
Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Cone-beam breast CT using an offset detector: effect of detector offset and image reconstruction algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2022 04 07; 67(8).
Score: 0.525
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28.
Score: 0.275
-
Fu Z, Tseng HW, Vedantham S. An attenuation field network for dedicated cone beam breast CT with short scan and offset detector geometry. Sci Rep. 2024 01 03; 14(1):319.
Score: 0.148
-
Fu Z, Tseng HW, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Bilgin A. A residual dense network assisted sparse view reconstruction for breast computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2020 12 03; 10(1):21111.
Score: 0.120
-
Vedantham S, Tseng HW, Konate S, Shi L, Karellas A. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020; 28(3):405-426.
Score: 0.112
-
Tseng HW, Vedantham S, Cho SH, Karellas A. Joint Optimization of Collimator and Reconstruction Parameters in X-Ray Fluorescence Computed Tomography Using Analytical Point Spread Function and Model Observer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 09; 67(9):2443-2452.
Score: 0.112
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. X-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT using a forward-projection model. Med Phys. 2017 Jun; 44(6):2312-2320.
Score: 0.093
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, Michaelsen KE, Krishnaswamy V, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD. Semi-automated segmentation and classification of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstructed images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:6188-91.
Score: 0.060
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar; 29(3):790-806.
Score: 0.057
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Albagli D, Han S, Tkaczyk EJ, Landberg CE, Opsahl-Ong B, Granfors PR, Levis I, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys. 2000 Mar; 27(3):558-67.
Score: 0.028
-
Sujlana PS, Mahesh M, Vedantham S, Harvey SC, Mullen LA, Woods RW. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2019 May - Jun; 55:188-195.
Score: 0.026
-
Li Z, Bilgin A, Johnson K, Galons JP, Vedantham S, Martin DR, Altbach MI. Rapid high-resolution T1 mapping using a highly accelerated radial steady-state free-precession technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 01; 49(1):239-252.
Score: 0.026
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. Library based x-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT. Med Phys. 2016 Aug; 43(8):4529.
Score: 0.022
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT. Med Phys. 2013 Mar; 40(3):031913.
Score: 0.017
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32.
Score: 0.011
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I. Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 21; 51(12):3041-55.
Score: 0.011
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging. 2004 Mar; 17(1):64-70.
Score: 0.009
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Ved H, Baker SP, D'Orsi CJ. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7.
Score: 0.009