Srinivasan Vedantham to Mammography
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Srinivasan Vedantham has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength
8.210
-
Tseng HW, Fu Z, Vedantham S. Simultaneous reduction of radiation dose and scatter-to-primary ratio using a truncated detector and advanced algorithms for dedicated cone-beam breast CT. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025 Mar 03; 11(2).
Score: 0.769
-
Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients. Med Phys. 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417.
Score: 0.659
-
Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector. Med Phys. 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088.
Score: 0.579
-
Vedantham S, Tseng HW, Konate S, Shi L, Karellas A. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020; 28(3):405-426.
Score: 0.537
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):114-121.
Score: 0.458
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. Radiology. 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84.
Score: 0.405
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A. Large-angle x-ray scatter in Talbot-Lau interferometry for breast imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 07; 59(21):6387-400.
Score: 0.374
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM, Conover DL. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 21; 58(22):7921-36.
Score: 0.350
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Emmons MM, Moss LJ, Hussain S, Baker SP. Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 21; 58(12):4099-118.
Score: 0.339
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Glick SJ, Karellas A. Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT. Med Phys. 2013 Jan; 40(1):011901.
Score: 0.331
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28.
Score: 0.329
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, Noo F. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory. Med Phys. 2012 Mar; 39(3):1530-41.
Score: 0.312
-
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, Michaelsen KE, Krishnaswamy V, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD. Semi-automated segmentation and classification of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstructed images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:6188-91.
Score: 0.288
-
Karellas A, Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Med Phys. 2008 Nov; 35(11):4878-97.
Score: 0.248
-
Vijayargahavan GR, Watkins J, Tyminski M, Venkataraman S, Amornsiripanitch N, Newburg A, Ghosh E, Vedantham S. Audit of Prior Screening Mammograms of Screen-Detected Cancers: Implications for the Delay in Breast Cancer Detection. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2023 Feb; 44(1):62-69.
Score: 0.165
-
Vedantham S, Shazeeb MS, Chiang A, Vijayaraghavan GR. Artificial Intelligence in Breast X-Ray Imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2023 Feb; 44(1):2-7.
Score: 0.165
-
Vijayaraghavan GR, Guembou IM, Vedantham S. The Current State of Timeliness in the Breast Cancer Diagnosis Journey: Abnormal Screening to Biopsy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2023 Feb; 44(1):56-61.
Score: 0.164
-
Vijayaraghavan GR, Ge C, Lee A, Roubil JG, Kandil DH, Dinh KH, Vedantham S. Savi-Scout Radar Localization: Transitioning From the Traditional Wire Localization to Wireless Technology for Surgical Guidance at Lumpectomies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2023 Feb; 44(1):12-17.
Score: 0.163
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype. J Digit Imaging. 2000 Nov; 13(4):191-9.
Score: 0.142
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Levis I, Sayag M, Kleehammer R, Heidsieck R, D'Orsi CJ. Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. Med Phys. 2000 Aug; 27(8):1832-40.
Score: 0.140
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Albagli D, Han S, Tkaczyk EJ, Landberg CE, Opsahl-Ong B, Granfors PR, Levis I, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys. 2000 Mar; 27(3):558-67.
Score: 0.136
-
Sujlana PS, Mahesh M, Vedantham S, Harvey SC, Mullen LA, Woods RW. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2019 May - Jun; 55:188-195.
Score: 0.123
-
O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Kawakyu-O'Connor DT. Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb; 39(1):106-113.
Score: 0.114
-
Shrestha S, Vedantham S, Karellas A. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling. Phys Med Biol. 2017 03 07; 62(5):1969-1993.
Score: 0.109
-
Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, Zhu L. Library based x-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT. Med Phys. 2016 Aug; 43(8):4529.
Score: 0.106
-
Vedantham S, Karellas A. Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar; 29(3):790-806.
Score: 0.068
-
Sechopoulos I, Vedantham S, Suryanarayanan S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):98-105.
Score: 0.059
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):434-43.
Score: 0.058
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):130-7.
Score: 0.056
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76.
Score: 0.055
-
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32.
Score: 0.055
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I. Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 21; 51(12):3041-55.
Score: 0.052
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Onishi SK. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 07; 50(17):3957-69.
Score: 0.050
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. Radiology. 2005 Jul; 236(1):31-6.
Score: 0.049
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D'Orsi CJ. A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging. 2004 Mar; 17(1):64-70.
Score: 0.045
-
Nisbet AI, Ahmadian D, Vedantham S, Chiang JA. An unusual artifact observed on screening mammography in a patient with an LVAD. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14255.
Score: 0.044
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Ved H, Baker SP, D'Orsi CJ. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7.
Score: 0.041
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Baker SP, Glick SJ, D'Orsi CJ, Webber RL. Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2001 Mar; 8(3):219-24.
Score: 0.036
-
Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Glick SJ, D'Orsi CJ, Baker SP, Webber RL. Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec; 7(12):1085-97.
Score: 0.036