Header Logo

Connection

Gina Vincent to Case Management

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gina Vincent has written about Case Management.
Connection Strength

1.926
  1. Drawbridge DC, Truong D, Nguyen NT, Lorenti VL, Vincent GM. Risk-need-responsivity: Evaluating need-to-service matching with reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance. Behav Sci Law. 2021 Feb; 39(1):106-122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.712
  2. Perrault RT, Paiva-Salisbury M, Vincent GM. Probation officers' perceptions of youths' risk of reoffending and use of risk assessment in case management. Behav Sci Law. 2012 Jul-Aug; 30(4):487-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.392
  3. Drawbridge DC, Todorovic K, Winters GM, Vincent GM. Implementation of risk-need-responsivity principles into probation case planning. Law Hum Behav. 2019 10; 43(5):455-467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  4. Vincent GM, Drawbridge D, Davis M. The validity of risk assessment instruments for transition-age youth. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Feb; 87(2):171-183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  5. Lawing K, Childs KK, Frick PJ, Vincent G. Use of structured professional judgment by probation officers to assess risk for recidivism in adolescent offenders. Psychol Assess. 2017 06; 29(6):652-663.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  6. Perrault RT, Vincent GM, Guy LS. Are risk assessments racially biased?: Field study of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in probation. Psychol Assess. 2017 06; 29(6):664-678.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  7. Vincent GM, Guy LS, Perrault RT, Gershenson B. Risk assessment matters, but only when implemented well: A multisite study in juvenile probation. Law Hum Behav. 2016 Dec; 40(6):683-696.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  8. Vincent GM, Guy LS, Gershenson BG, McCabe P. Does risk assessment make a difference? Results of implementing the SAVRY in juvenile probation. Behav Sci Law. 2012 Jul-Aug; 30(4):384-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.