Header Logo

Connection

David Ayers to Registries

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Ayers has written about Registries.
Connection Strength

1.400
  1. Ayers DC, Fehring TK, Odum SM, Franklin PD. Using joint registry data from FORCE-TJR to improve the accuracy of risk-adjustment prediction models for thirty-day readmission after total hip replacement and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15; 97(8):668-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  2. Ayers DC, Franklin PD. Joint replacement registries in the United States: a new paradigm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 17; 96(18):1567-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  3. Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov; 471(11):3482-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  4. Franklin PD, Lewallen D, Bozic K, Hallstrom B, Jiranek W, Ayers DC. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 17; 96 Suppl 1:104-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  5. Ayers D, Franklin P. Improve care through outcomes reporting. Mod Healthc. 2013 Dec 02; 43(48):34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  6. Ayers DC, Bozic KJ. The importance of outcome measurement in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov; 471(11):3409-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  7. Franklin PD, Allison JJ, Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26; 308(12):1217-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  8. Franklin PD, Karbassi JA, Li W, Yang W, Ayers DC. Reduction in narcotic use after primary total knee arthroplasty and association with patient pain relief and satisfaction. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):12-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.