Elizabeth Evans to California
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elizabeth Evans has written about California.
Connection Strength
1.659
-
Evans EA, Zhu Y, Yoo C, Huang D, Hser YI. Criminal justice outcomes over 5 years after randomization to buprenorphine-naloxone or methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. Addiction. 2019 08; 114(8):1396-1404.
Score: 0.154
-
Evans E, Padwa H, Li L, Lin V, Hser YI. Heterogeneity of Mental Health Service Utilization and High Mental Health Service Use Among Women Eight Years After Initiating Substance Use Disorder Treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Dec; 59:10-9.
Score: 0.118
-
Evans E, Li L, Min J, Huang D, Urada D, Liu L, Hser YI, Nosyk B. Mortality among individuals accessing pharmacological treatment for opioid dependence in California, 2006-10. Addiction. 2015 Jun; 110(6):996-1005.
Score: 0.116
-
Evans E, Li L, Pierce J, Hser YI. Explaining long-term outcomes among drug dependent mothers treated in women-only versus mixed-gender programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Sep; 45(3):293-301.
Score: 0.102
-
Anglin MD, Nosyk B, Jaffe A, Urada D, Evans E. Offender diversion into substance use disorder treatment: the economic impact of California's proposition 36. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun; 103(6):1096-102.
Score: 0.101
-
Evans E, Li L, Grella C, Brecht ML, Hser YI. Developmental timing of first drug treatment and 10-year patterns of drug use. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Mar; 44(3):271-9.
Score: 0.097
-
Evans E, Anglin MD, Urada D, Yang J. Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36. Eval Program Plann. 2011 May; 34(2):124-34.
Score: 0.085
-
Evans E, Hser YI, Huang D. Employment services utilization and outcomes among substance abusing offenders participating in California's proposition 36 drug treatment initiative. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct; 37(4):461-76.
Score: 0.079
-
Evans E, Li L, Hser YI. Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment. Eval Program Plann. 2009 Aug; 32(3):204-12.
Score: 0.075
-
Evans E, Li L, Hser YI. Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Dec; 35(4):410-8.
Score: 0.072
-
Hser YI, Evans E. Cross-system data linkage for treatment outcome evaluation: lessons learned from the California Treatment Outcome Project. Eval Program Plann. 2008 May; 31(2):125-35.
Score: 0.071
-
Hser YI, Huang D, Brecht ML, Li L, Evans E. Contrasting trajectories of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine use. J Addict Dis. 2008; 27(3):13-21.
Score: 0.070
-
Evans E, Longshore D, Prendergast M, Urada D. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: client characteristics, treatment completion and re-offending three years after implementation. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2006 Nov; Suppl 3:357-67.
Score: 0.065
-
Evans E, Spear SE, Huang YC, Hser YI. Outcomes of drug and alcohol treatment programs among American Indians in California. Am J Public Health. 2006 May; 96(5):889-96.
Score: 0.062
-
Evans E, Hser YI. Pilot-testing a statewide outcome monitoring system: overview of the California Treatment Outcome Project (CALTOP). J Psychoactive Drugs. 2004 May; Suppl 2:109-14.
Score: 0.054
-
Evans E, Longshore D. Evaluation of the substance abuse and crime prevention act: treatment clients and program types during the first year of implementation. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2004 May; Suppl 2:165-74.
Score: 0.054
-
Krebs E, Enns B, Evans E, Urada D, Anglin MD, Rawson RA, Hser YI, Nosyk B. Cost-Effectiveness of Publicly Funded Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in California. Ann Intern Med. 2018 01 02; 168(1):10-19.
Score: 0.035
-
Krebs E, Urada D, Evans E, Huang D, Hser YI, Nosyk B. The costs of crime during and after publicly funded treatment for opioid use disorders: a population-level study for the state of California. Addiction. 2017 May; 112(5):838-851.
Score: 0.033
-
Krebs E, Min JE, Evans E, Li L, Liu L, Huang D, Urada D, Kerr T, Hser YI, Nosyk B. Estimating State Transitions for Opioid Use Disorders. Med Decis Making. 2017 07; 37(5):483-497.
Score: 0.033
-
Nosyk B, Li L, Evans E, Urada D, Huang D, Wood E, Rawson R, Hser YI. Utilization and outcomes of detoxification and maintenance treatment for opioid dependence in publicly-funded facilities in California, USA: 1991-2012. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 01; 143:149-57.
Score: 0.028
-
Hser YI, Hunt SA, Evans E, Chang YJ, Messina NP. Hispanic parenting women in women-only versus mixed-gender drug treatment: a 10-year prospective study. Addict Behav. 2012 Jun; 37(6):729-35.
Score: 0.023
-
Hser YI, Kagihara J, Huang D, Evans E, Messina N. Mortality among substance-using mothers in California: a 10-year prospective study. Addiction. 2012 Jan; 107(1):215-22.
Score: 0.023
-
Fosados R, Evans E, Hser YI. Ethnic differences in utilization of drug treatment services and outcomes among Proposition 36 offenders in California. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Dec; 33(4):391-9.
Score: 0.017
-
Hser YI, Evans E, Teruya C, Huang D, Anglin MD. Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants. Eval Program Plann. 2007 May; 30(2):187-96.
Score: 0.016
-
Hser YI, Teruya C, Brown AH, Huang D, Evans E, Anglin MD. Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement. Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan; 97(1):104-9.
Score: 0.016
-
Ettner SL, Huang D, Evans E, Ash DR, Hardy M, Jourabchi M, Hser YI. Benefit-cost in the California treatment outcome project: does substance abuse treatment "pay for itself"? Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb; 41(1):192-213.
Score: 0.015
-
Hser YI, Grella C, Evans E, Huang YC. Utilization and outcomes of mental health services among patients in drug treatment. J Addict Dis. 2006; 25(1):73-85.
Score: 0.015
-
Hser YI, Evans E, Huang YC. Treatment outcomes among women and men methamphetamine abusers in California. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Jan; 28(1):77-85.
Score: 0.014
-
Hser YI, Teruya C, Evans EA, Longshore D, Grella C, Farabee D. Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes. Eval Rev. 2003 Oct; 27(5):479-505.
Score: 0.013