 Peer Review
"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
| Descriptor ID |
D010380
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review- Peer Review
- Review, Peer
- Peer Reviews
- Reviews, Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2007 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 2017 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.
-
Liaw L, Freedman JE, Becker LB, Mehta NN, Liscum L. Peer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Res. 2017 Aug 04; 121(4):e9-e19.
-
Day SA, Cucci M, Droege ME, Holzhausen JM, Kram B, Kram S, Pajoumand M, Parker CR, Patel MK, Peitz GJ, Poore A, Turck CJ, Van Berkel MA, Wong A, Zomp A, Rech MA. Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: January-December 2014. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Nov 15; 72(22):1974-85.
-
Eisenberg RL, Ngo L, Boiselle PM, Bankier AA. Honorary authorship in radiologic research articles: assessment of frequency and associated factors. Radiology. 2011 May; 259(2):479-86.
-
Brook OR, Kane RA, Tyagi G, Siewert B, Kruskal JB. Lessons learned from quality assurance: errors in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis on ultrasound and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar; 196(3):597-604.
-
Wynne KE, Simpson BJ, Berman L, Rangel SJ, Grosfeld JL, Moss RL. Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Jan; 46(1):131-7.
-
Pederson T. Counterpoint: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation. FASEB J. 2007 Feb; 21(2):309-10; discussion 311.
-
Blauvelt A, Bernhard J. Rapid publication for selected JAAD articles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Feb; 50(2):299-300.
-
Spodick DH. A look at SRR by DHS. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Feb 1; 75(4):315-6.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|