Comparative Effectiveness Research

"Comparative Effectiveness Research" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

Conduct and synthesis of systematic research comparing interventions and strategies to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor health conditions. The purpose of this research is to inform patients, providers, and decision-makers, responding to their expressed needs, about which interventions are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances. (hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/draftdefinition.html accessed 6/12/2009)

Descriptor ID	D057186
MeSH Number(s)	H01.770.644.145.360.500 N05.425.157
Concept/Terms	Comparative Effectiveness Research Comparative Effectiveness Research Effectiveness Research, Comparative Research, Comparative Effectiveness

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Comparative Effectiveness Research".

Natural Sciences [H]
Natural Science Disciplines [H01]
Science [H01.770]
Research [H01.770.644]
Biomedical Research [H01.770.644.145]
Health Services Research [H01.770.644.145.360]
Comparative Effectiveness Research [H01.770.644.145.360.500]
Health Care [N]
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation [N05]
Health Services Research [N05.425]
Comparative Effectiveness Research [N05.425.157]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is related to "Comparative Effectiveness Research".

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Comparative Effectiveness Research".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Comparative Effectiveness Research" by people in this website by year, and whether "Comparative Effectiveness Research" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 30 publications over 10 distinct years, with a maximum of 6 publications in 2016

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
2011	0	1	1
2012	4	0	4
2013	1	2	3
2014	2	1	3
2015	1	1	2
2016	1	5	6
2017	0	4	4
2018	0	3	3
2019	1	1	2
2020	0	2	2

Below are the most recent publications written about "Comparative Effectiveness Research" by people in Profiles.

Bosch NA, Rucci JM, Massaro JM, Winter MR, Quinn EK, Chon KH, McManus DD, Walkey AJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Heart Rate Control Medications for the Treatment of Sepsis-Associated Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2021 04; 159(4):1452-1459.

View in: PubMed
Wakeman SE, Larochelle MR, Ameli O, Chaisson CE, McPheeters JT, Crown WH, Azocar F, Sanghavi DM. Comparative Effectiveness of Different Treatment Pathways for Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 02 05; 3(2):e1920622.

View in: PubMed
Stevens EM, Cohn AM, Villanti AC, Leshner G, Wedel A, Wagener TL. Perceived Effectiveness of Anti-Marijuana Messages in Adult Users and Nonusers: An Examination of Responses to Messages About Marijuana's Effects on Cognitive Performance, Driving, and Health. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019 07; 80(4):415-422.

View in: PubMed
Desai M, Montez-Rath ME, Kapphahn K, Joyce VR, Mathur MB, Garcia A, Purington N, Owens DK. Missing data strategies for time-varying confounders in comparative effectiveness studies of non-missing time-varying exposures and right-censored outcomes. Stat Med. 2019 07 30; 38(17):3204-3220.

View in: PubMed
Broder-Fingert S, Walls M, Augustyn M, Beidas R, Mandell D, Wiltsey-Stirman S, Silverstein M, Feinberg E. A hybrid type I randomized effectiveness-implementation trial of patient navigation to improve access to services for children with autism spectrum disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 03 27; 18(1):79.

View in: PubMed
Wang C, Schmid CH, Fielding RA, Harvey WF, Reid KF, Price LL, Driban JB, Kalish R, Rones R, McAlindon T. Effect of tai chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2018 03 21; 360:k851.

View in: PubMed
Gaudino M, Burzotta F, Bakaeen F, Bertrand O, Crea F, Di Franco A, Fremes S, Kiemeneij F, Louvard Y, Rao SV, Schwann TA, Tatoulis J, Tranbaugh RF, Trani C, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart DP. The Radial Artery for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures or Surgery? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 03 13; 71(10):1167-1175.

View in: PubMed
Dai JC, Dunmire B, Sternberg KM, Liu Z, Larson T, Thiel J, Chang HC, Harper JD, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images. World J Urol. 2018 May; 36(5):727-732.

View in: PubMed
Mazor KM, Richards A, Gallagher M, Arterburn DE, Raebel MA, Nowell WB, Curtis JR, Paolino AR, Toh S. Stakeholders' views on data sharing in multicenter studies. J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Sep; 6(6):537-547.

View in: PubMed
Horwitz RI, Hayes-Conroy A, Caricchio R, Singer BH. From Evidence Based Medicine to Medicine Based Evidence. Am J Med. 2017 11; 130(11):1246-1250.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals