Header Logo


Kate Lapane to Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kate Lapane has written about Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic.
  1. Lu J, Gary KW, Copolillo A, Ward J, Niemeier JP, Lapane KL. Randomized controlled trials in adult traumatic brain injury: a review of compliance to CONSORT statement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr; 96(4):702-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  2. Yang S, Eaton CB, Lu J, Lapane KL. Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Jun; 23(6):560-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  3. Clyne B, Bradley MC, Hughes C, Fahey T, Lapane KL. Electronic prescribing and other forms of technology to reduce inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy in older people: a review of current evidence. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May; 28(2):301-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  4. Lu J, Gary KW, Neimeier JP, Ward J, Lapane KL. Randomized controlled trials in adult traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012; 26(13-14):1523-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  5. Pedone C, Lapane KL. Generalizability of guidelines and physicians' adherence. Case study on the Sixth Joint National Commitee's guidelines on hypertension. BMC Public Health. 2003 Jul 21; 3:24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  6. Constantine GD, Graham S, Lapane K, Ohleth K, Bernick B, Liu J, Mirkin S. Endometrial safety of low-dose vaginal estrogens in menopausal women: a systematic evidence review. Menopause. 2019 07; 26(7):800-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  7. Lu J, Marmarou A, Lapane KL. Impact of GOS misclassification on ordinal outcome analysis of traumatic brain injury clinical trials. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20; 29(5):719-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  8. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane KL, Swine C, Hanlon JT. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007 Jul 14; 370(9582):173-184.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.